AI Rate Professor

English

Jawad Ali

ENG1A · ENG1A4605 · ENG1A4612 · ENG1C · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
91.67%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a fair English class with and can keep up with writing deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear feedbackFair gradingMany papersOnline engagingLate grading
  • Students , and accessibility.
  • Most reviews describe the course as manageable, but paper and .
  • The main drawback is slow or last-minute grading, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very attainable when students complete papers and discussions, but it is not effortless because writing deadlines and no appear in several reviews.

Online evidence supports a manageable A with steady work, while and more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content is usually described as straightforward English writing with , though some students found the workload and .

Online reviews call the material fairly easy, while in-person-coded reviews include one complaint about weak instruction and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

, but online participation and discussion boards are important.

Online evidence points to required participation through discussions, while policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend him because he is caring, clear, responsive, and .

Online reviews are strongly recommending him, while because of one very negative 2020 review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Most reviews describe fair or , but a few call him tough and note no .

Format shift

Online grading is mostly viewed as fair or easy, while and a tough-grader complaint.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The class usually has weekly discussions and several papers, which is manageable but writing-heavy.

Format shift

Online workload is steady but manageable, while in-person-coded reviews include .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students usually describe him as , and strong with feedback.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strong, while and less reliable.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven mostly by essays, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize essays and discussions, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

because two are positive but one describes a poorly taught remote 2020 experience.

Main concern

The negative review reports little teaching, heavy papers, and .

What students said

“A lot of essays but gives a together.”
ENG1A
“ at all & just assigns youtube videos.”
ENG1C
“ ”
ENG1A4605

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive, with , and manageable assignments.

Main concern

Grades may be posted late, and course.

What students said

“His video lectures are awesome and genuinely interesting.”
ENG1C
“ and four total essays in the semester with prompts provided to you and a .”
ENG1C
“He gives no and .”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one review mentions grammar exams and another mentions a final.

Grammar Exam MentionedFinal MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.

Grammar Exam MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ .”
ENG1C

Online

Online reviews mention a final but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or .

Final MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“We had 1 weekly discussion and a peer response, 4 essay papers and a final.”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His video lectures are awesome and genuinely interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“He gives tons of and checks in with everyone every week to see if anyone has any questions.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ !!”

⚖️

74/100

“He is a and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His video lectures are awesome and genuinely interesting.
  • He is a great, caring, and thorough teacher.
  • Professor always updated , and made self available & was understanding & worked well w/us.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The writing assignments are not too hard, but he can be .
  • as well but grades are inputted late in the semester.
  • He gives no and .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • and four total essays in the semester with prompts provided to you and a .
  • He assigns basically a on something thats not too difficult to write about.
  • A lot of essays but gives a together.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across several years give , and online delivery, despite one outlier negative review.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1C7 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
ENG1A46051 review
ENG1A46121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1