AI Rate Professor

Communication

Lilly Johnson

COMMS100 · COMS100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can handle unclear online organization or if you value a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSupportive in personPoor online communicationEasy workTricky testsOrganization varies
  • Reviews are mixed because in-person students describe support, while online students report communication and organization problems.
  • The coursework can be easy, but .
  • The small review count makes the profile less stable than larger professor datasets.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Grades can be good and work may be easy, but and tricky tests can raise the effort cost.

Online evidence is inconsistent because one student found it easy and another found it very confusing, while require studying.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The class content and work sound manageable, but the material itself.

Online difficulty is more about organization, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One in-person tag says skipping class hurts passing, and there is no strong evidence that .

; online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but the online communication complaint prevents a stronger recommendation.

, while online reviews are sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Reported grades are strong, but tricky tests and .

Format shift

Online grading feels less predictable because assignments changed, while .

Workload

Light

76/100

Students describe the work as easy, with no strong pattern of heavy workload complaints.

Format shift

In-person work is described as easy, while online workload is not the main issue compared with organization.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

She is supportive and fun for some students, but online communication and organization problems are serious weaknesses.

Format shift

because online reviews criticize communication and Canvas structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

The clearest assessment evidence mentions tests, while and inconsistent.

Format shift

, while online evidence mentions assignments and due dates without a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are more favorable, describing her as caring and .

Main concern

Students need to study for tests and may not love her style.

What students said

“This professor genuinely cares about you and wants you to pass the class.”
COMMS100
“Shes nice but kinda annoying. Her work is pretty easy.”
COMS100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between a fun easy class and a serious complaint about poor communication and Canvas organization.

Main concern

The , and weak communication.

What students said

“She was a fun teacher, but bad with communication.”
COMMS100
“She's constantly changing assignments and and she doesn't communicate effectively for a comms professor”
COMS100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly prove that tests can be tricky and require studying, with , or final format.

Tricky TestsStudy Required

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not prove a specific exam policy.

Tricky TestsStudy Required
“ so you have to study.”
COMMS100

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's hard to get a hold of & .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting format-based differences in , and workload; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“This professor genuinely cares about you and wants you to pass the class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“She was a fun teacher, but bad with communication.”

⚠️ Online Organization

35/100

“ and she doesn't communicate effectively for a comms professor”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was a fun teacher, but bad with communication.
  • This professor genuinely cares about you and wants you to pass the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • so you have to study.
  • Her work is pretty easy.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • She's constantly changing assignments and and she doesn't communicate effectively for a comms professor
  • She's hard to get a hold of & .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and they conflict sharply by format, so the evidence is limited.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMMS1002 reviews
COMS1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values