AI Rate Professor

Fire Technology

Adam Iqueda

FTEC120 · FTEC144 · EMT128 · FIRETECH1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a and helps connect class work to real healthcare or fire careers.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorCareer-focused adviceClear expectationsDemanding but supportiveAccessible help
  • Students unanimously praise his caring, practical support and career guidance.
  • The course can be demanding, especially with reading and commitment.
  • Strong outcomes are realistic when students pace themselves and participate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

A grades are common, but students describe the course as demanding and , and steady participation.

and pacing, while and commitment.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material is manageable with , but the course still requires commitment and applied professional focus.

and high demand, while in-person evidence frames the challenge as commitment-based.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly treated as important, especially in the in-person course, but no strict penalty policy is clearly proven.

pass, while online evidence emphasizes participation and pacing.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Every review is positive because students , and career help.

Both online and and practical field guidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades are strong when students do the required work, but as effortless or automatic.

Format shift

Both formats show good grades, with online reviews sounding more demanding and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload includes meaningful reading and commitment, but students do not describe it as overwhelming when paced well.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reading and demand more clearly, while and showing up.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and useful for career direction.

Format shift

and resources, while in-person reviews emphasize mentoring and job opportunities.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention reading, participation, and commitment but do not clearly identify a .

Format shift

Neither format gives enough detail to separate assessment weight confidently.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews emphasize job guidance, accessibility, and one-on-one help, with commitment and .

Main concern

Attendance and commitment matter for passing.

What students said

“He helped me get hired as a woodland firefighter for CalFire”
FTEC120
“ if you plan on getting in this field.”
FTEC120
“This course takes commitment to pass!”
FTEC144

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online , and practical career advice, while one review calls the class very demanding.

Main concern

Students must keep up with reading and pace themselves.

What students said

“Good instructor but class is very demanding.”
EMT128
“Explains material well, provides .”
EMT128
“He actually cares for his students and wants them to succeed .”
FIRETECH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Iqueda is very involved in his students' learning. Very down-to-earth, realistic, and caring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, workload, and career value; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Explains material well, provides .”

👍 Recommendation Strength

100/100

“Really great professor . I took him last semester and was honestly one of the .”

💼 Career Value

95/100

“He helped me get hired as a woodland firefighter for CalFire”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Explains material well, provides .
  • He is a good instructor.
  • Really great instructor.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • Very down-to-earth, realistic, and caring.
  • He will work with you one on one if needed, just ask.
  • He actually cares for his students and wants them to succeed .

Theme 3

📈 About Effort

  • Good instructor but class is very demanding.
  • This course takes commitment to pass!
  • Read the book, pace yourself, use recall to study.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years are consistent and detailed, but the sample is still small.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FTEC1203 reviews
EMT1282 reviews
FIRETECH11 review
FTEC1441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values