AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Abdelwahab El-Abyad

MATH170 · MATH12 · MATH150 · MATH23 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and learn well from practice-based math instruction.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHomework HeavyTest HeavyPolarizing TeachingLenient When ClearAccent Barrier
  • some call him one of the , while others say they had to teach themselves.
  • Homework is a major workload driver, but class material.
  • Getting an A is possible for disciplined students, but weak math students may struggle with pace, clarity, and communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic when students do the homework and use test patterns, but heavy workload and .

Online evidence is limited to one review with , while and serious struggle.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is manageable for prepared students but becomes hard .

Both formats mention understanding barriers, with and mixed clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because multiple reviews say skipping class hurts passing, though exact policy is not consistently stated.

The ; the single online review does not clarify attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend him only if you have strong work ethic and and uneven teaching clarity.

Online evidence is negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some reviews call him lenient and mention formula sheets or lowest-score replacement, but others call him tough or hard with grading.

Format shift

The online review says grading can be hard, while and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

as nonstop, daily, or a ton, even when it helps prepare for tests.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews describe heavy homework, with .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is polarizing because some students praise his help and clarity, while others report mumbling, speed, and impatience.

Format shift

Online evidence is mildly negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

as preparation and many tests reflecting homework or previous exams.

Format shift

Online and as central, but in-person reviews give more detail about prior tests and formulas.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with strong praise for helpfulness and test alignment but serious complaints , and patience.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“ ”
MATH170
“Lectures consist of him mumbling, speeding through the material”
MATH150
“He's a ”
MATH12

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review reports , and lectures that run over time.

Main concern

The main concern .

What students said

“There was a ton of homework, but .”
MATH150
“ , but he can be a little hard with grading”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams seem predictable and often based on homework or prior tests, but reviews .

Tests From HomeworkFormula SheetsPrevious Test ReviewShow All Work Required

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, class material, or previous tests, with some formula-sheet support.

Tests From HomeworkFormula SheetsFinal From Previous TestsNo Calculators Mentioned
“ .”
MATH170
“he provides you with a formula sheet for ”
MATH150
“we don't use calculators”
MATH23

Online

The online review says tests are straightforward and require showing all work, but it does not .

Straightforward TestsShow All Work Required
“ ”
MATH150
“you just need to show all your work”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you have a strong work ethic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“He's one of the .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“You'll spend probably 2-3 hours on homework every day after class.”

⚖️

52/100

“He is always willing to help students if , and he provides you with a formula sheet for .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He clearly presents the material and .
  • Lectures consist of him mumbling, speeding through the material
  • His accent is difficult to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's a
  • There was a ton of homework

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • He is always willing to help students if
  • and you understand.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years provide detailed but polarized , and exams.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1507 reviews
MATH122 reviews
MATH232 reviews
MATH1701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2