AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Gregory George

ARC199 · ET165 · ARCH199 · ET101 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can work independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear LecturesLimited Student SupportHigh RiskOne Positive Outlier
  • Most , and weak support for students who need help.
  • One review is strongly positive, but four of five reviews are sharply negative.
  • Grades reported include A and A-, but comments do not show an easy or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Reported A grades exist, but comments describe poor structure and limited help, making the path to an A unreliable.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course experience sounds difficult because , and prior preparation may matter.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students warn against taking him because of , and poor support.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

A and A- grades appear, but reviews do .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention grades, and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention projects and difficulty, but do not consistently describe workload volume.

Format shift

and no online evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and weak student support.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment, mainly through projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and lack of guidance.

Main concern

Students may not receive enough structure or help to succeed comfortably.

What students said

“the class has no direction. Stay away”
ET101
“ and does not plan ahead.”
ARC199
“Thorough and communicative.”
ARCH199

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and does not plan ahead.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Expect lectures to be choppy, done whenever he feels like it and not make sense.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“Stay away”

⚖️ Student Support

35/100

“He is not willing to break things down further for students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and does not plan ahead.
  • Expect lectures to be choppy, done whenever he feels like it and not make sense.
  • Thorough and communicative.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Support

  • if you haven't taken 199 it is .
  • He is not willing to break things down further for students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

and are mostly consistent, but detail is uneven and one review is a strong positive outlier.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ARCH1992 reviews
ARC1991 review
ET1011 review
ET1651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values