AI Rate Professor

Communication

Farhya Salim

COMS100 · COMS1005742 · COM3094 · COM100 · COMMS130 · COMMS100 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a and can follow rules closely.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorStrict AttendanceStrong FeedbackTough StandardsEngaging Lectures
  • , and public speaking growth.
  • Several students warn that lateness, missed materials, and .
  • The single online review is strongly negative and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say you must prepare, meet deadlines, attend, and follow presentation rules exactly.

The easy-A evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the single .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The communication content is learnable and practical, but , and strict preparation rules raise the challenge.

, while the online review only criticizes lecture tone.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance and punctuality are treated as essential, and late or absent students may lose presentation credit.

, while the online review does not address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and strong learning, but strict rules and tone create a real risk for some students.

In-person recommendation is mixed-positive, while the only online review is clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

because missed outlines, lateness, and incomplete materials can cost major credit despite some evidence.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clarify grading.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Workload includes speeches, essays, exams, and preparation, but it is not described as overwhelming by most students.

Format shift

, while the online review only says lecture-heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students call her caring, knowledgeable, and effective, but several describe her as intimidating or overly forceful.

Format shift

, while the lone online review is poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and some exams rather than relying on only tests.

Format shift

Assessment details come from in-person reviews, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly praise her as , and effective while warning that and deadlines.

Main concern

Late arrivals and missed preparation can block students from presenting or earning credit.

What students said

“Preparation is the biggest thing for this class!”
COMS100
“She will not let you speak or turn in work even if you are 1 minute late!”
COMS100
“You do learn a lot about public speaking, which is great.”
COMMS100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative and describes the class as lecture-heavy and one-sided.

Main concern

The review says disagreement with her viewpoint is handled poorly.

What students said

“I find If you don't agree with her she will beat you down”
COM3094

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and exams, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Trick QuestionsSome ExamsSpeech-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams but do not clearly prove book rules or .

Trick QuestionsTwo Exams
“ ”
COMMS100
“2 speeches, 1 group speech, 3 essays, 2 exams, random mini speeches.”
COMMS130

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes a super tough professor however you learn a lot!”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She's brilliant and cares deeply for her students.”

⚖️

35/100

“she will fail you with no problem she's kinda heartless when it comes to grades”

⏰

12/100

“And never be late to class! You wont get to present”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she makes her lectures interesting and relatable.
  • Amazing communicator with relevant topics.
  • She's very straightforward & sticks to the rules

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Preparation is the biggest thing for this class!
  • Well maybe if you did the work she wouldn't fail you..

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she worked with upon each class.
  • and she is fair in all her deadlines,
  • Wonderfully hilarious and open to talk.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years give useful patterns, but only one online review limits format confidence.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COMMS1004 reviews
COM1002 reviews
COMS1002 reviews
COM30941 review
COMMS1301 review
Show 1 more courses
COMS10057421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values