AI Rate Professor

English

Yvette Hawley

ENGLA6229 · ENGLISH82 · ENG1A · ENG82 · ENG1A6223 · ENG84 · ENG1A6224 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and gives students confidence.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorHelpful feedbackEasy if you workFunny and engagingOccasionally disorganized
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as caring, helpful, and .
  • The class is usually manageable or easy when students complete assignments and participate.
  • The main recurring weakness is organization, with some complaints about changing schedules or inconsistent pacing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students often call the class easy or manageable, but they , and show effort.

Online evidence is only one positive review, while students who do the work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The and reasonable, though some students report disorganization or heavier focus during certain terms.

Online evidence is too limited to separate meaningfully, while to follow.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Participation and showing up matter, but reviews suggest it is usually encouraged rather than harshly policed.

The online , while in-person reviews say participation and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and fair to students who try.

Both formats are positive, but the because it has far more reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

She can be tough or fair, but students repeatedly say doing the assignments and showing effort leads to good outcomes.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited, while and easy passing with effort.

Workload

Light

76/100

Most reviews describe a reasonable workload with readings, vocabulary tests, chapter reviews, essays, and if kept up.

Format shift

The online review gives no workload detail, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Her strongest pattern is supportive, clear, caring teaching that makes students feel helped and confident.

Format shift

The single online review and and care.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention homework, reading, vocabulary tests, chapter reviews, essays, and participation more than major exams.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, with little online detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and approachable teaching, with some concerns about organization.

Main concern

A few students found her schedule and organization messy.

What students said

“ and .”
ENG1A
“ , and keeps changing dates on the syllabus.”
2015

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is strongly positive and emphasizes care, guidance, and student support.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so format-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“She truly cares about her profession and will try to understand your position as a student and guide you through your troubles.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and essays, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Vocabulary TestsChapter ReviewsEssay Assignment

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and an essay, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or final format.

Vocabulary TestsChapter ReviewsEssay Assignment
“ .”
ENG84
“About 6 Vocab Tests and Chapter Reviews, and an A!”
ENG84

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, take-home, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, workload, organization, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Support

91/100

“She truly cares about her profession and will try to understand your position as a student and guide you through your troubles.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ .”

📘 Course Manageability

84/100

“Very Easy A! Just do the work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and concise when she lectures.
  • She was a very helpful teacher.
  • Amazing teacher. She really cares about her students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A.
  • As long as .
  • , but fair and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • The only trouble is she has health issues and is absent sometimes.
  • Her organization is not as strong this term.
  • , and keeps changing dates on the syllabus.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 19 reviews over many years are highly consistent, though only one review is online.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG847 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
20152 reviews
63072 reviews
ENG1A62231 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG1A62241 review
ENG821 review
ENGLA62291 review
ENGLISH821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1