AI Rate Professor

Art

Paul Wenner

ART131 · ART133 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can follow directions closely and manage online work without reminders.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful feedbackTough gradingOnline self-managementUnclear in-person teaching
  • Online reviews are split between strong praise for feedback and frustration with self-managed assignments.
  • as tough, but following directions can still lead to success.
  • The only in-person review and projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students must follow directions closely and .

Online evidence shows tough but , while the single .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The and educational, but and self-management make the course feel harder.

Online reviews describe manageable assignments with discipline, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One review warns that skipping class means you will .

The attendance warning comes from an online review, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations are sharply split between and students who found the course poorly supported.

Online reviews are mixed but include strong praise, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple online reviews call him a , though .

Format shift

Strict grading evidence is mainly online, with .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Assignments are described as fun but require independent tracking and practice.

Format shift

Online reviews mention self-managed assignments, while the workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Online students often praise his feedback, but the and .

Format shift

Online teaching appears stronger than in-person based on the available comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on assignments, projects, practice, and .

Format shift

Both formats point more toward project and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only in-person review says lectures and .

Main concern

Projects may not be explained clearly in class.

What students said

“ .”
ART131

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students praise his talent and feedback but warn that and .

Main concern

Online work may lack reminders and gives little credit for practice time.

What students said

“The and you learn from them.”
ART133
“I must say he is a .”
ART133
“Take if and no credit for hours of practice.”
ART133

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take if and no credit for hours of practice.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Professor Wenner knows what he is doing and his very talented.”

⚖️

28/100

“I must say he is a .”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Wenner knows what he is doing and his very talented.
  • The teacher was bad. Not very good lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • I must say he is a .
  • Just do the and you will be fine.
  • Take if and no credit for hours of practice.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews are available, but they include specific and , and format differences.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1333 reviews
ART1311 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2