AI Rate Professor

Biology

Margaret Steinberg

ANATO30 · 34A · PYO31 · ANAT30 · ANAT1001 · APHY34B · PHYSI31 · ANAT32 · APHYS34A · ANATP34B · 34B · AP34A · ANPH34B · ANATPHYS34A · ANATPHYSIO31 · PHYS31 · APHY34A · ANA1004 · ANAT4835 · ANATPHYSIO · LS109 · ANAT030 · ANATPHY34B · ANA30 · 94 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle a heavy science workload and are comfortable learning a lot independently.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadTest heavyExtra credit availableLecture heavyTough grading
  • Students consistently describe anatomy and physiology as demanding, time-heavy courses with difficult exams.
  • In-person reviews are mixed because some students value her organization, notes, and , while online reviews are strongly negative.
  • Getting an A is possible but , and using every opportunity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible with , attendance, and serious studying, but students repeatedly warn that it is not easy.

Online evidence points to very low A accessibility, while students.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

The course content is dense, fast, and and physiology.

Both formats are challenging, but online students report less instructional support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many reviews say showing up matters, and as necessary to pass or .

, while online reviews focus more on deadlines and workload.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendations are sharply mixed, but the dominant recent online tone and unless highly prepared.

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

exists, but and exams as tough or unfair.

Format shift

Online reviews describe harsh grading more strongly, while as a partial offset.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and exams.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with online reviews especially focused on constant assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Some students praise her knowledge and notes, but many describe boring lectures, poor online teaching, and .

Format shift

Online teaching is viewed much worse than in-person teaching, where opinions are more divided.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and tests more than projects or papers.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams and quizzes, while online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students report a very difficult class with lots of lectures, exams, and , but if they study hard.

Main concern

The main risk is heavy studying and exams that many students feel are difficult or poorly aligned.

What students said

“This was by far the hardest class Ive ever taken.”
ANATPHYS34A
“It's not an easy class but it's possible to get an A if you put in the extra hours to study and learn the material.”
34A

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe the class as poorly taught, overloaded with assignments, and hard to manage.

Main concern

Students and the workload is excessive.

What students said

“No amount of time management will prepare you for this class.”
ANATPHYSIO31
“She doesnt teach and expects you to learn the material yourself without any guidance.”
ANATPHYSIO

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult quizzes and exams that often feel deeper or different from study materials, but .

Frequent QuizzesDifficult ExamsLecture And Lab ExamsStudy Guide Misalignment

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention difficult lecture and lab exams, large question counts, and material mismatch, but .

Lecture ExamsLab ExamsHigh Question CountMaterial Mismatch
“her teaching style didn't really make it easier.”
PHYS31
“She will schedule a 200 question exam along with an hour lecture.”
ANAT32

Online

Online reviews mention difficult quizzes, one-minute-per-question exams, and study guide mismatch, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

One-Minute QuestionsDifficult QuizzesStudy Guide Mismatch
“The exams were 1 minute per question.”
PYO31
“ her 'PowerPoints'”
APHY34B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was by far the hardest class Ive ever taken.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“She doesnt teach and expects you to learn the material yourself without any guidance.”

⚖️

28/100

“ and very very difficult, but if you study for them, they really help you digest the information.”

📚 Workload Load

12/100

“No amount of time management will prepare you for this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures put me to sleep and she lectures even after exams which are 100 questions each.
  • She gives very descriptive and thorough lecture notes.
  • She doesnt teach and expects you to learn the material yourself without any guidance.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Do not expect an easy A.
  • She gives a lot of and I thought she was fair with grading and tests.
  • An A depends on a mixture of prior knowledge, genius, and

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams And Workload

  • There is a lot of on top of studying for a .
  • The exams were 1 minute per question.
  • She will schedule a 200 question exam along with an hour lecture.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

94

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 545
4 out of 513
3 out of 55
2 out of 510
1 out of 521

Course coverage

34A7 reviews
ANAT305 reviews
34B4 reviews
APHY34A4 reviews
PHYS314 reviews
Show 20 more courses
ANATO303 reviews
ANATPHY34B2 reviews
ANATPHYS34A2 reviews
AP34A2 reviews
APHYS34A2 reviews
301 review
ANA10041 review
ANA301 review
ANAT0301 review
ANAT10011 review
ANAT321 review
ANAT48351 review
ANATP34B1 review
ANATPHYSIO1 review
ANATPHYSIO311 review
ANPH34B1 review
APHY34B1 review
LS1091 review
PHYSI311 review
PYO311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

4

B+ 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1