AI Rate Professor

Human Development

Amy LaCoe

HDEV2545 · HUMDEV110 · HUMANDEV110 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

She looks like a strong in-person choice, but the limited online evidence is a warning.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring in personExtra creditClear assignmentsPoor online deliveryGroup projects
  • In-person students strongly recommend her for , and .
  • The single online review is very negative and criticizes audio quality, monotone delivery, and low interaction.
  • All reported grades are A, so the class appears grade-friendly despite format differences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

All three reviewers reported an A, and in-person students mention and .

The A evidence appears in both formats, but positive grade support is much stronger in person.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings are low, and students say the material is understandable and clearly mapped out.

In-person reviews describe the class as understandable, while the online review criticizes delivery rather than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most students recommend her, but the only online review is strongly negative.

, while online evidence is negative and low-confidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

All reported grades are A, and students mention and .

Format shift

, while online evidence still ended with an A.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

One online review tags lots of homework, while pressure.

Format shift

Online workload may be heavier, but and not alarming.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

In-person teaching is praised as caring and clear, but the online review sharply criticizes engagement and audio quality.

Format shift

Teaching quality appears much stronger in person than online.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention group projects and assignments, but .

Format shift

, while online assessment details are vague.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews describe her as , and .

Main concern

There is too little evidence to rule out course-to-course variation.

What students said

“she is wonderful and inspirational.”
HUMDEV110
“ and , so there are no surprises.”
HUMANDEV110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review describes poor lecture delivery and little interaction despite an A outcome.

Main concern

Online delivery may feel disengaged and technically weak.

What students said

“she reads off a script in the most monotone voice I have ever heard.”
HDEV2545

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Highly recommend Amy LaCoe. She is amazing and cares about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“she is wonderful and inspirational.”

📈 Grade Friendliness

84/100

“she gives a lot of .”

💻 Online Concern

35/100

“she reads off a script in the most monotone voice I have ever heard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is wonderful and inspirational.
  • She is amazing and cares about her students.
  • she reads off a script in the most monotone voice I have ever heard.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Structure

  • she gives a lot of .
  • and , so there are no surprises.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews are available, with one online review conflicting sharply with .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HDEV25451 review
HUMANDEV1101 review
HUMDEV1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values