AI Rate Professor

English

Erika Gavitt

ENGL1A · ENGL1C4623 · ENG1A · 1C · ENGL1CH · ENG1CH · ENGLISH1C · ENGL1C · ENGL4622 · ENG1C · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Take Gavitt if you want serious writing growth and , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDetailed FeedbackHeavy ReadingTough GradingCaring but Demanding
  • and care, but the workload is consistently heavy.
  • Getting an A is possible, especially online, but most students say it requires strong writing and steady effort.
  • In-person reviews are more divided, with repeated complaints , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say you must write well, complete lots of work, and .

Online has two A reports but also harsh workload warnings, while and comments show a harder path.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course content , and sustained essay work.

Online students call some work easy but time-consuming, while and demanding reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation and deadlines matter, but reviews do not prove a .

Online reviews mention deadlines and discussions, while in-person reviews emphasize .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and feedback but hesitate because the workload and .

Online and more positive when students have enough time.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Multiple students call her a , and complain about limited full credit or no .

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, with online students and full-credit difficulty.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Online workload is especially criticized in winter session, while and many papers.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often described as caring and helpful, but , and lecture density hurt the experience.

Format shift

Online reviews praise accessibility but flag workload, while in-person reviews show stronger disagreement about teaching quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The evidence centers on essays, papers, discussions, reading, and .

Format shift

Both formats appear assignment-heavy, with online discussions and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and real writing improvement, but also frequent frustration with , and dense lectures.

Main concern

Many students found the papers, readings, and .

What students said

“She will guide u but also make you work.”
ENGL1C
“her lecture is really dense and she assigns SO many papers.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students report accessible support and , but several warn that the work can become extreme in short sessions.

Main concern

Heavy workload and busy students.

What students said

“She gives a lot of busy work but it's pretty easy.”
ENGL1A
“ unless you do not have a life or any other classes.”
ENGL1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book exams, or a specific exam format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or a .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She will guide u but also make you work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“My writing has really improved, and I have her to thank for that.”

⚖️

25/100

“Need to work for your grade.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“her lecture is really dense and she assigns SO many papers.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes sure .
  • My writing has really improved, and I have her to thank for that.
  • She is a really sweet teacher. She's caring but .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • She gives a lot of busy work but it's pretty easy.
  • It was a ridiculous amount of work expected from us for a winter session class.
  • She assigns a lot of which is doable, but you really need to have a lot of .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Need to work for your grade.
  • Must be able to write at a proficient university level to ace the essays.
  • Super petty and she doesn't even tell you where to improve.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across online and in-person formats give , and mixed recommendations.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1C3 reviews
ENGL1C3 reviews
1C1 review
ENG1A1 review
ENG1CH1 review
Show 5 more courses
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL1C46231 review
ENGL1CH1 review
ENGL46221 review
ENGLISH1C1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1