AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Vage Avakyan

MATH0600 · MATH170TRIG · MATH40 · MATHMATH · SGLVARCALC · MATH170 · MATH80 · MATH23 · MATH70 · CALC180 · MATH150 · MATH180 · MATH190 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you are already strong in , and want a tough class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard TestsHeavy AccentSelf-Teaching RequiredTough GraderPolarizing Instructor
  • Many students say he knows math, but a large share struggle with , and classroom style.
  • Grades are possible for strong or self-taught students, but , and heavy homework.
  • The single online review is positive, while the , and mostly warning-heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students earn As, but most comments say high grades require , and .

The one online review sounds easier, while the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Math content is already demanding, and students , and .

Online evidence describes manageable exams, but , and test-heavy courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students repeatedly say attendance is necessary, roll may be taken, and skipping class hurts passing chances.

The attendance evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Most students do not recommend him because the , and stressful despite his math knowledge.

The only online review recommends the course, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students frequently call him a and , and grades that must be earned.

Format shift

, while the single online review says exams were not that hard.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

and often important for survival, though some reviews say it is not always excessive.

Format shift

, but the heavy workload concern is far better supported in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

He is knowledgeable and sometimes helpful, but , and harsh interactions.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised once, while and often criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and homework practice as preparation for those tests.

Format shift

, while online evidence only says exams were manageable.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly polarized but , and needing outside resources.

Main concern

Students often report that they must teach themselves and .

What students said

“make sure you seek outside resources.”
MATH180
“ and .”
MATH170TRIG

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is positive, describing an organized, accommodating course with .

Main concern

The online evidence is too limited to generalize confidently.

What students said

“A lot of homework but the .”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because many in-person students report hard, tricky, or nearly impossible tests and finals.

Hard TestsTest HeavyFinal Can Be Very HardNo Partial Credit Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Hard TestsTest HeavyFinal Can Be Very HardNo Partial Credit Mentioned
“ and .”
MATH170TRIG
“he gives .”
MATH170

Online

The only online review says the evidence of proctoring, open-book rules, or webcam use.

Exams Not That HardPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“the .”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will have to teach yourself so if you are good at doing so then this is the class for you; otherwise seek another professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom experience. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He knows , so I admire that about him. But TEACHING is NOT for him!”

🧪

28/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

33/100

“If .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He knows his math, but this class is impossible!
  • He doesn't explain concepts - just does thousands of examples for you to figure out.
  • Will do anything for his students to understand the trig.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Some people did receive A's but they knew a lot of material prior to taking the class.
  • He does not give away grades,but you do get what you earn.
  • . Really Hard to get an A comming from an A student.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • Do not take him!! .
  • He will belittle you over the most simple question
  • only the strong survive

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years provide a large, detailed, and consistent record of polarized but recurring concerns.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 58
3 out of 59
2 out of 512
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH1808 reviews
MATH1507 reviews
MATH1907 reviews
MATH236 reviews
MATH806 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH1705 reviews
MATH170TRIG3 reviews
1701 review
801 review
CALC1801 review
MATH06001 review
MATH401 review
MATH701 review
MATHMATH1 review
SGLVARCALC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

4

C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1