AI Rate Professor

English

Susanna Desimone

ENGLISH82 · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG1CH · ENGL1C · ENG80 · ENGL84 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Susanna Desimone is a strong choice for students , and steady writing practice.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear OrganizationStrong FeedbackCaringWriting HeavyFair Expectations
  • Most , and genuine support for student writing.
  • The course is writing-heavy, but and manageable if students stay on schedule.
  • Online reviews are mostly positive with two older negative exceptions about late work and course setup.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic for students who meet writing deadlines, revise, and complete the assigned work.

Online reviews show more writing workload but , while as fairly simple if students show up and participate.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The material is approachable because prompts, modules, rubrics, and .

, though online English composition requires more sustained writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as harshly policed, but participation and staying current are important for success.

, while online reviews stress weekly deadlines and discussion boards.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Students recommend her because , and gives useful feedback that improves writing.

Online reviews are mostly positive with a few workload complaints, while but fewer in number.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

She expects college-level writing and deadlines, but , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention revision opportunities and clear criteria, while and participation.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , and homework, but students usually describe it as manageable with time.

Format shift

Online reviews mention heavier paper and weekly work, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently praise her , and caring attitude.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised for structure and feedback, while and support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment is , and participation, with the final described as low weight.

Format shift

Online evidence strongly emphasizes essays and weekly assignments, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person evidence , and straightforward homework-based success.

Main concern

The main concern is that attendance and participation matter for doing well.

What students said

“pretty much her class is not that hard”
ENG80
“ and fairly simple.”
ENGL84
“Show up and participate and you're set and ready to go.”
ENGL84

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students , and fair writing expectations, though a few warn about workload and setup issues.

Main concern

The main concern is keeping up with , and deadlines.

What students said

“ and easy to understand”
ENG1CH
“She gives lots of homework, but she gives you a full week to complete it.”
ENGL1C
“The course shell was not set up properly”
ENGL1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

one online final worth only 10 percent and in-person quizzes tied to the book.

Low-Weight FinalBook QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Book QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
ENG80

Online

Online reviews mention a final worth only 10 percent but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Low-Weight FinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Final is only worth 10 percent”
ENG1CH

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The prof has been great and easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She actually cares that you learn the material and know how to write for college.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

84/100

“I'll be taking her ENGL 1C class during the winter”

📝 Writing Workload

55/100

“Be prepared to write around 4 essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and was active online
  • The syllabus and and organized.
  • Most amazing professor I've had so far.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Most important thing in this class is meeting the page requirement.
  • She expects college level work.
  • As long as you stay on top of your work, you'll be fine.

Theme 3

📝 About Writing Work

  • She gives lots of homework, but she gives you a full week to complete it.
  • and fairly simple.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

The 10 reviews provide useful detail across formats, but the sample is moderate and includes a few older or conflicting online experiences.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1A3 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ENG1CH1 review
ENG801 review
ENGL1C1 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGL841 review
ENGLISH821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values