AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Rafique Mohammad

ANAT30 · PHYO131 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a knowledgeable instructor and can handle lecture-heavy material with difficult exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeableCaringLecture HeavyHard ExamsSome Curve
  • Students see him as knowledgeable and understanding, but the course is academically demanding.
  • first test.
  • Grades are achievable, but students need strong study habits and memory for heavy content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades are possible with effort, but high difficulty, heavy memorization, and .

Online evidence shows an A- with high difficulty, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The material appears difficult because students report lecture-heavy content and a lot of information to remember.

Online and more directly describing content load.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

One tag says skipping class hurts performance, but the reviews do not prove a .

The , while the online review only requests more live interaction.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

because he is knowledgeable, understanding, and .

Online sentiment is stronger than in-person sentiment, which is more average but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

There is evidence of one curve and , but and expectations were unclear.

Format shift

In-person evidence mentions a curve and , while online evidence only .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The course appears demanding because reviews mention participation, lecture-heavy material, and lots of information to remember.

Format shift

, while online evidence is less specific.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is described as knowledgeable and understanding, though .

Format shift

Online feedback is clearly positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Student comments , and memorized information rather than assignments.

Format shift

, while online evidence does not give a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review describes an average lecture-heavy class with .

Main concern

Test preparation and .

What students said

“A .”
ANAT30
“its a lot of information to remember”
ANAT30

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review praises his knowledge and understanding but wishes for more live interaction.

Main concern

The class may need more direct interaction for some students.

What students said

“He has the knowledge and is understanding.”
PHYO131
“I wish this was a live class and we had to interact with him one on one.”
PHYO131

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and uneven review support, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or closed-book rules.

Difficult ExamsGeneral Test ReviewUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence describes test reviews and difficult exams with lots of memorization, but .

Difficult ExamsGeneral Test ReviewCurve On First Test
“He really gave a good detailed review for the 1st test (and curved)”
ANAT30
“gave a because its a lot of information to remember”
ANAT30

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Unclear Online Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He has the knowledge and is understanding.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and interaction. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“He has the knowledge and is understanding.”

🧪

45/100

“gave a because its a lot of information to remember”

⚖️

58/100

“He really gave a good detailed review for the 1st test (and curved)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I felt he was great.
  • He has the knowledge and is understanding.
  • He was average.

Theme 2

📈

  • He really gave a good detailed review for the 1st test (and curved)
  • A .
  • its a lot of information to remember

Theme 3

🤝 About Interaction

  • I wish this was a live class and we had to interact with him one on one.
  • Too many students try to cheat in this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews across different formats give limited evidence, and the comments differ in tone and detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANAT301 review
PHYO1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values