AI Rate Professor

Communication

Ashely Graham

CST100 · COMS100 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and are willing to complete the required work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Grading CriteriaGood FeedbackEasy GraderAttendance Matters
  • and useful feedback.
  • Getting a good grade appears manageable when students complete speeches and SEE-I assignments.
  • because while another called the class an easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A looks realistic if students complete the expected speeches and SEE-I work, though .

Online evidence calls her an easy grader, while but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course seems manageable because , but required speeches and .

Online evidence is lightly positive, while and attending.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One in-person tag directly says skipping class can prevent passing.

The attendance concern comes from in-person evidence, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most comments are positive about clarity and grading, but .

The online review recommends her, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students describe easy grading and , but one review labels her a .

Format shift

, while .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload appears manageable but depends , and class participation.

Format shift

Online workload detail is sparse, while .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students praise clear expectations and .

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both support clarity, though .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments mention speeches and SEE-I assignments more than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but differ on grading strictness.

Main concern

Attendance and completing speeches or .

What students said

“ ”
COMS100
“ , do your SEE-I'S and speeches and you'll pass.”
COMS100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and .

Main concern

There is only one online review, so format-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“ and is a .”
CST100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Online

The online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , do your SEE-I'S and speeches and you'll pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

76/100

“ ”

📈 Grade Path

78/100

“ , do your SEE-I'S and speeches and you'll pass.”

⚖️

72/100

“ and is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and is a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , do your SEE-I'S and speeches and you'll pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they provide consistent evidence on grading clarity across both formats.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMS1002 reviews
CST1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values