L Phillips

ENG1A · ESL53B · ENGA · ENG84 · ENGA6214 · A · ENG1C · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 86/100
RMP rating: 4.2/5
Take again: 70%
Difficulty: 2.4

The decision

Take her if you want a structured English class where following directions and staying current are rewarded.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear RubricsLots Of ReadingStrict AttendanceHelpful FeedbackEngaging Personality

Most students praise her as engaging, helpful, and clear about expectations.
Grades are usually attainable if students follow instructions, participate, and meet deadlines.
Workload is reading- and writing-heavy, with stricter attendance expectations in some in-person classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic for students who follow rubrics, participate, attend, and complete all writing assignments.

Online reviews stress deadlines and rubrics, while In person reviews add stronger attendance and participation expectations.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The class is approachable but still requires steady reading, essays, and close attention to instructions.

Online evidence highlights reading and discussion posts, while In person evidence highlights participation, essays, and attendance.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Several reviews say attendance, punctuality, participation, or Zoom sessions matter and can affect passing.

Online has one mandatory Zoom warning, while In person reviews more strongly warn against absences and lateness.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her because she is engaging, clear, and helpful when students follow directions.

In person reviews are more enthusiastic overall, while Online reviews are positive but include grading and Zoom concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Rubrics are clear and grades are attainable, but essays can be graded hard with little extra credit.

Format shift

Online reviews praise rubrics but include one tough-grader complaint, while In person reviews show fair but strict standards.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention lots of reading, essays, homework, discussion posts, and projects.

Format shift

Online work is reading and discussion heavy, while In person work includes essays, presentations, and attendance demands.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students find her engaging, structured, funny, and helpful for improving writing.

Format shift

In person reviews are especially positive, while Online reviews are positive but less uniformly warm.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades appear driven mainly by essays, reading, discussion posts, classwork, and projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments and participation instead of exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing lively discussions, clear instructions, and learning gains.

Main concern

Attendance and tardiness can be strict, and essays may be graded firmly.

What students said

“Just do as she says, complete the assignments ,and you should pass the class easily.”
ENG1A

“you cant be late multiple times to this class because .”
ENG84

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise clear rubrics but mention heavy reading, essays, discussion posts, and one mandatory Zoom concern.

Main concern

Online work can feel writing-heavy, and one review says Zoom sessions are mandatory.

What students said

“she has a clear rubric she goes off of when she grades”
ENG1A

“Zoom sessions are mandatory at a specific time.”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews focus on essays, projects, reading, attendance, and quizzes, but do not clearly prove a standard exam policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Just do as she says, complete the assignments ,and you should pass the class easily.”
Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Ms. Phillips is truly amazing.”

📘 Workload

45/100

“Lots of essays.”

⚖️ Grading Fairness

62/100

“she has a clear rubric she goes off of when she grades”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

she is good teacher.
She makes class so fun and goes over the reading thoroughly.
Very easy class. She is a great teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

Lots of essays. But her rubrics are clear and she grades accordingly.
there is no extra credit and grades really hard.
if u follow her instructions and

Theme 3

⏰ About Attendance And Participation

doesn't play when it comes to absence and tardiness.
you cant be late multiple times to this class because .
as long as you participate you are on her good side and you are set.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across many years provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence, though some are older.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511

4 out of 53

3 out of 53

2 out of 50

1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews

ESL53B3 reviews

A1 review

ENG1C1 review

ENG841 review

Show 2 more courses

ENGA1 review

ENGA62141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

B 2

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1