AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Shima Haghighat

CHEM4 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her if you can self-study and want a , but if you need polished lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringFast PacedSelf Study NeededGenerous GradingParticipation Pressure
  • Students consistently say she cares and .
  • Grades , and .
  • Several students found lectures fast, error-prone, or hard .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic if and use , but weak lectures and few graded items can make it risky.

Online evidence is too limited, while but .

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The chemistry content is treated as fast paced and not truly introductory for some students.

The online review only notes pacing, while and expected background knowledge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance seems important because participation and cold calling are repeatedly mentioned, but .

In-person reviews mention cold calling and participation pressure; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and but warn that teaching clarity is inconsistent.

The only online review is mildly positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Grading is helped by and generosity, though some reviews mention tough or few graded items.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the ; the .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

as heavy, but the and self-study.

Format shift

but ; online workload evidence is minimal.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

She is caring and approachable, but several students report unclear, fast, or mistake-filled teaching.

Format shift

Online feedback is positive but limited; and lecture problems.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades appear to rely heavily on quizzes and .

Format shift

; the online review does not describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and grading positives offset by fast lectures, cold calling, and .

Main concern

Students may need the textbook because .

What students said

“ and points.”
CHEM4
“Really fast pace course.”
CHEM4
“I suggest to also read the book and study by yourself.”
CHEM4

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is positive but asks for a slower pace.

Main concern

The course may move too quickly online.

What students said

“I'd suggest to go through the course materials with a slower pace even with the cost of covering less subjects.”
CHEM4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests but do not clearly .

Quiz And Test HeavyFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests but do not clearly prove format or .

Quiz And Test HeavyFew Graded Items
“your and tests.”
CHEM4
“Graded by few things”
CHEM4

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She made chem less stressful and more approachable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“It is obvious that she cares for the students and .”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“If you do and understand your HW then you will do fine in the class.”

⚠️ Course Pace

43/100

“Really fast pace course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cares and loves the subject.
  • She's a new teacher and doesn't have a teaching style.
  • It was also difficult to understand her english at most times.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and points.
  • and your and tests.
  • .

Theme 3

🙋 About Class Experience

  • She calls on people quite a lot rather than asking for volunteers.
  • Less of this would make a better flow of information and save on time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews give useful detail, but the sample is small and the online evidence is only one review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM46 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1