AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Ana Milosevic-Nguyen

BUS1A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can handle strict grading, no flexibility, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh gradingNo retakesTech issuesStrict classroom controlHeavy assignments
  • Both reviews describe unforgiving policies when students faced serious or technical problems.
  • Students report no redo chances, no , and .
  • The online review adds technology problems and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because comments describe no retakes, no , and .

Both formats report rigid grading, with online and in person focused on no redo or .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course seems challenging mainly because assignments and because students praise deep content difficulty.

Online evidence emphasizes assignments taking far longer than expected, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

The in-person review says students must pay attention or risk being called out and told to leave class.

Attendance evidence comes mainly from the in-person review, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly warn against the course because they felt unsupported during emergencies and technical issues.

Both formats are negative, with online citing poor technology support and in person citing harsh classroom and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

because both reviews describe no retakes, no , and severe exam consequences.

Format shift

Online and room for student problems.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload sounds heavy because 30 minutes.

Format shift

The workload concern is explicit online, while the volume.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe the professor as unsupportive, strict, and unwilling to help students pass.

Format shift

Online comments stress poor technology handling, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The strongest evidence centers on tests and .

Format shift

as the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review describes strict classroom expectations, no , no redo chances, and willingness to fail a student after a tech issue.

Main concern

In-person students may be penalized heavily for missed work or .

What students said

“she won't grant you an opportunity to redo them or any ”
BUS1A
“she was willing to fail me”
BUS1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports , and unexpectedly long assignments.

Main concern

Online students may face rigid test policies and .

What students said

“she didn't let me retake the ”
BUS1A
“creates assignments that are meant to last 30 minutes but end up taking 3 hours”
BUS1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly describe strict exam policies and , but do not prove open-book status, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

No RetakesStrict Exam PolicyTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

10/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and that an exam tech issue could still lead to failure, but does not clearly prove closed-book or .

Test HeavyStrict Exam Policy
“I had tech issue with and she was willing to fail me”
BUS1A

Online

The online review says a , but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

No RetakesStrict Exam Policy
“she didn't let me retake the ”
BUS1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is not the type of professor that will help you pass, I had tech issue with and she was willing to fail me”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She is not the type of professor that will help you pass”

⚖️

5/100

“she won't grant you an opportunity to redo them or any ”

🧪

10/100

“she didn't let me retake the ”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • she won't grant you an opportunity to redo them or any
  • she was willing to fail me

Theme 2

💻 About Online Experience

  • she sucks with technology
  • creates assignments that are meant to last 30 minutes but end up taking 3 hours

Theme 3

🚪 About Classroom Climate

  • you have to pay attention to her, or she will call you out and tell you to leave her class
  • She is not the type of professor that will help you pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, but both are detailed and strongly consistent in describing strict, unsupportive policies.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BUS1A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1