Jill Evensizer

MATH220 · MATH73 · MATH170 · MTH220 · MAT180 · MATH80 · PRECAL · MATH191 · MATH12 · MATHS270 · MATH210 · ENGIN9 · MATH180 · MATH0186 · MATH190 · MATH270 · 84 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 36/100
RMP rating: 3.1/5
Take again: 38.89%
Difficulty: 3.3

The decision

if you can teach yourself, tolerate disorganization, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized gradingTest heavyPolarizing lecturerCondescending toneOptional homework

Student opinion is highly split, but negative reviews , and rude behavior.
Grades often depend on a few tests, making the course risky .
Some students praise her knowledge, humor, and leniency, especially if they are strong self-learners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible for strong students, but the and make it high-risk.

Online reviews make the A path look especially risky, while and severe warnings.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content is often difficult, and students say skipped steps, fast pacing, and .

Both formats report confusion, with online reviews emphasizing skipped steps and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and , but some reviews say participation or showing up matters.

and participation, while online reviews do not clearly establish attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Most negative students warn against taking her because of , and .

Online reviews are strongly negative, while but still carry many serious warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students call her generous or easy, but many describe harsh outcomes and grades .

Format shift

and tough-grader complaints, while online reviews are more negative.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

, but the workload feels heavier because so much grade weight.

Format shift

Both formats mention few collected assignments, but online students complain that major grades were delayed until the end.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

She can explain concepts for some students, but many describe her as .

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly poor, while but lean unstable.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are repeatedly described as depending mostly on a .

Format shift

Both formats strongly support a test-heavy or few-assignment assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but , and heavy reliance on exams.

Main concern

The biggest risk is a disorganized, test-heavy structure with inconsistent teaching clarity.

What students said

“Unorganized. Gets distracted easily. Rude and classless.”
MAT180

“ , and always behind schedule.”
MATH270

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and few high-stakes assignments.

Main concern

Online students report and .

What students said

“She also didnt grade 3 of the 4 assignments we had until the end of the semester.”
MATH180

“Horrible. Do yourself a favor and .”
MATH180

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style varies by course, with many reviews describing few high-stakes tests and .

Test HeavyFew high-stakes examsTake-home exam portionsDelayed exam grading

Assessment risk

Varies

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe a test-heavy structure with some take-home exam portions, but .

Few high-stakes examsTake-home exam portionsNon-cumulative final in one course

“she gives a lot of exam”
MATH270

“Class grade depended only on 5 big tests, final included everything covered during the semester.”
MATH191

Online

and but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, webcam, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Test HeavyFew graded assignmentsDelayed grading

“ yet she could not find time to grade them until after the semester was over.”
MATH180

“graded 3 tests at the end of semster”
MATH180

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ if you can teach yourself, tolerate disorganization, and .”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ , and makes students feel bad for not knowing material she cant even teach.”

⚖️

48/100

“She only gave us 4 exams and those are the only things we were graded on.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

36/100

“DO NOT ENROLL IN HER CLASS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She often skips over steps assuming the class would know the information already.
.
She can break down hard concepts into simple terms and answer your questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

Class grade depended only on 5 big tests, final included everything covered during the semester.
Prof evensizers a , and she understands how difficult the subject is so she gives her students a break.
She also didnt grade 3 of the 4 assignments we had until the end of the semester.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization and Tone

Unorganized. Gets distracted easily. Rude and classless.
, and always behind schedule.
is occasionally condescending .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years provide rich, , and split teaching experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521

4 out of 518

3 out of 515

2 out of 519

1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH17010 reviews

MATH18010 reviews

MATH2708 reviews

ENGIN93 reviews

MAT1803 reviews

Show 12 more courses

MATH733 reviews

MATH1902 reviews

MATH802 reviews

18015211 review

MATH01861 review

MATH121 review

MATH1911 review

MATH2101 review

MATH2201 review

MATHS2701 review

MTH2201 review

PRECAL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

B+ 1

C range

C 2

D range

No reported values

F

F 1

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2

Jill Evensizer

x x x if you can teach yourself, tolerate disorganization, and x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Varies

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

👍 Recommendation Rate

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

⚠️ About Organization and Tone

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you can teach yourself, tolerate disorganization, and .

⚖️