AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Yih Hwang

CSCI1 · CS1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you already know coding and can learn mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor teachingSelf-taught codingUnorganized lecturesHeavy lecturesTough grader
  • Students strongly criticize the teaching as , and .
  • Online students say beginners must teach themselves C++ and may struggle badly.
  • Some students call him understanding or lenient, but every review .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A decent grade may be possible for experienced or self-taught students, but beginners face a high effort cost and .

Online reviews make the A feel much harder because students report self-teaching, while but poor lecture support.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels difficult mainly because coding explanations are unclear and because support is strong.

Online evidence is harsher about learning C++ alone, while and dull lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but lecture-heavy teaching and warnings against skipping make it important.

Online reviews include a skip-class warning, while and organization problems.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

6/100

Students overwhelmingly advise avoiding him because the and students feel .

Both online and in-person reviews are negative, with online reviews using the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Online reviews label him tough and describe high failure risk, though .

Format shift

and struggle, while in-person evidence is mixed because one student calls him lenient.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention weekly assignments, many long lectures, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly assignments and self-learning, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Reviews repeatedly say he cannot , and students must learn material themselves.

Format shift

Online reviews are extremely negative, while but still criticize lecture quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention , and possible quizzes, so assessment is mixed but .

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and a midterm, while and possible non-multiple-choice quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are less harsh but .

Main concern

Lectures are hard to absorb because , and unclear.

What students said

“ ”
CS1
“ if you have options.”
CS1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly negative, saying students must learn C++ alone and .

Main concern

Students say the professor gives little help and .

What students said

“You have to learn C++ by yourself.”
CSCI1
“ .”
CSCI1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

comments about a midterm being replaced and possible non-multiple-choice quizzes.

Midterm dropped and replacedPossible non-multiple-choice quizFew graded itemsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and possible non-multiple-choice quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or strict proctoring policy.

Few graded itemsPossible non-multiple-choice quiz
“Graded by few things”
CS1
“If there's one, beware that it won't be MCQs.”
CS1

Online

Online reviews mention a and replaced, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Midterm dropped and replacedReviews do not clearly prove proctoring
“ and replaced.”
CSCI1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“This professor cannot teach and you have to learn C++ by yourself.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

6/100

“ if you have options.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“There are weekly assignments you have to complete, but it is a pain to .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor cannot teach and you have to learn C++ by yourself.
  • The lectures always put me to sleepy mode and .

Theme 2

⚠️ About Difficulty and Support

  • You have to learn C++ by yourself.
  • He is little to no help.
  • If you have NO knowledge of coding, don't bother with this class.

Theme 3

🧾 and Assessments

  • and replaced.
  • Graded by few things
  • Lenient professor, but he is lecture heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

63/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, specific, and consistently negative about teaching quality.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CS12 reviews
CSCI12 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2