Mark Feilds

AJ103 · AJ100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 70/100
RMP rating: 3.9/5
Take again: 0%
Difficulty: 3.0

The decision

if available, but be cautious with online sections because the workload evidence is poor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring in personFunny lecturesHelpful teacherOnline workload problems

In-person reviews describe him as caring, funny, helpful, and experienced.
The only online review is strongly negative because of excessive assignments and poor access to work.
Grade evidence is too thin to call the class an easy A overall.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One online student earned an A despite heavy stress, but the comments do not prove that high grades are easy.

Online evidence shows an A with heavy workload, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, but the online workload makes the course experience harder.

In-person reviews sound easier and more engaging, while the online review describes severe workload pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly state an .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students strongly praise him in person, but the online review is a .

, while the only online review recommends avoiding that format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The comments provide almost no grading policy evidence beyond one online A.

Format shift

Online has one A with heavy workload, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The online review describes an .

Format shift

The heavy workload warning comes only from the online review, while .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and engaged, but online delivery appears poor.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised, while the online review reports frustrating course management.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The clearest assessment .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews give no assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe him as , and helpful.

Main concern

There is little detailed grading or assessment evidence in the in-person reviews.

What students said

“GREAT TEACHER! VERY HELPFUL!”
AJ100

“really cares about his students”
7000

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports and .

Main concern

The workload may become overwhelming if .

What students said

“assigning 31 assignments for one week is too much”
AJ103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , open-book, quiz, midterm, or final policies.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“GREAT TEACHER! VERY HELPFUL!”
Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting format differences in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“He has vast experience in the criminal justice field and he always shares great stories.”

⚠️ Online Workload

28/100

“This is the most stressed I have EVER been for a class.”

👍 In-Person Appeal

58/100

“ !! He is the coolest professor on EARTH!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

really cares about his students
he is just plain funny

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

assigning 31 assignments for one week is too much
angered me to no end.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and the online evidence depends on a single negative review.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 51

Course coverage

AJ1002 reviews

70001 review

AJ1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

A 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Mark Feilds

x x x x if available, but be cautious with online sections because the workload evidence is poor.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Varies

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚠️ Online Workload

👍 In-Person Appeal

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📚 About Workload

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if available, but be cautious with online sections because the workload evidence is poor.