AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Wei-Feng Chen

MATH170 · MATH80 · MATH12 · MAT2240 · STATS150 · MATH150 · STATS101 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can teach yourself math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandOpen-note examsSelf-teaching requiredTest heavyLenient exam aids
  • Many students say his lectures are hard to understand and often require self-teaching.
  • Grades can be easier than the learning experience because .
  • Recommendation is low because students separate grade leniency from weak teaching quality.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Grades can be easy because reviews mention open-note , and easy grading despite weak teaching.

Online evidence does not prove easy grading, while aids.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The math content is not always the hardest part, but and self-teaching make it feel harder.

Online evidence is too thin, while be easy but confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears useful for reviews and , but comments do .

and review sessions; the online review does not clarify attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

because lectures are hard to understand and .

The online review is mildly positive but not recommending him, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and dropped tests make grading relatively forgiving.

Format shift

Lenient grading evidence .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

, but self-teaching and test preparation add hidden workload.

Format shift

, while the online review only says the class is test heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Many students describe , poor preparation, heavy PowerPoint reading, and difficulty understanding him.

Format shift

Online evidence calls him caring, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Reviews repeatedly mention , and open-note exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly say the class can be easy to pass because of open-note tests, but .

Main concern

Students often report having to learn the material on their own.

What students said

“I had to learn everything on my own as he read directly off a powerpoint”
MATH150
“You may not learn much but easy A, .”
MATH80
“I FOUND AND .”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says he was caring but and .

Main concern

The review and test-heavy structure.

What students said

“He was an and cared about your grades.”
MATH170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often student-friendly because in-person , and a dropped test, though teaching quality remains weak.

Open-Note TestsOpen-Book TestsCheat Sheet AllowedDropped Lowest TestCumulative Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews strongly support open-note or cheat-sheet exams, chapter exams, and a , but .

Open-Note TestsOpen-Book TestsCheat Sheet AllowedDropped Lowest TestCumulative Final
“He allows 8x11 cheat sheet (i used both sides).”
MATH150
“open-notes, open classwork.”
MATH80
“An and .”
STATS101

Online

The online review says the course is test heavy but does not clearly .

Test Heavy
“Test heavy”
MATH170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I FOUND AND .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, grade leniency, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“I had to learn everything on my own as he read directly off a powerpoint”

📈 Easy Grade Potential

80/100

“You may not learn much but easy A, .”

📝

84/100

“All tests and quizes are open note.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very hard to understand, very few examples given in class about Math problems.
  • He comes across as ill prepared for class and will swear something is correct when it really isn't.
  • more than half of the student dropped and he can't teach

Theme 2

📈

  • The class is easy to pass.
  • as so it is optional to do it.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Self-Teaching

  • I had to learn everything on my own as he read directly off a powerpoint
  • I learned everything on my own but I didn't enjoy the dullness experience.
  • You get out of this class what you put in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews span many years with and forgiving tests.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1507 reviews
STATS1504 reviews
MATH803 reviews
MATH122 reviews
MATH1702 reviews
Show 2 more courses
STATS1012 reviews
MAT22401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1