AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susan Bickford

STATS0762 · MATH170 · MATH80 · STATS150 · MATH67 · MATH150 · MATH180 · MATH130 · STATS · MATH067 · 105 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
17.14%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can handle a strict, high-workload math class and are ready to self-manage aggressively.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming homeworkTough graderTest heavySelf-teaching riskPolarizing support
  • Most students describe a very heavy workload with , and .
  • Many negative reviews say lectures and and that students must teach themselves.
  • A smaller and helpful if students ask for help, but even positive reviews warn that the class requires serious work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even students , and , so an A requires heavy sustained effort.

Online and and heavy work, with in-person reviews adding more detail about strict policies.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content is made harder , and students often feeling forced to teach themselves.

Online reviews stress poor exam alignment, while and excessive non-math work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Reviews describe harsh attendance expectations, strict lateness reactions, and repeated warnings that skipping class means failure.

online reviews focused more on deadlines and workload.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

19/100

Most students do not recommend her because they , and poor teaching clarity.

Online reviews are negative overall, and the few strong defenders.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Students repeatedly call her a and describe , and few forgiving outcomes.

Format shift

Both formats show harsh grading concerns, with .

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Homework, , and tests are repeatedly described as excessive.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tons of homework, while and repeatedly describe overwhelming workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A minority find her caring and clear, but most detailed , and students must self-teach.

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly negative about learning, and in-person reviews are sharply polarized but mostly critical.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention a mix of , and gateways rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize tests and homework, while , and gateways.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized but mostly warn , and unclear teaching.

Main concern

The main risk is a demanding structure that many students say causes failure or withdrawal.

What students said

“stay away from her. !”
MATH067
“Absolutely obscene amounts of .”
MATH150
“Be ready to put in some serious work.”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing tons of , and .

Main concern

Students report heavy workload and .

What students said

“Tons of homework. I didn't learn anything.”
MATH150
“The workload is Major”
STATS150
“Avoid!!!”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and difficult testing environment, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyHard ExamsMock Exams Differ From Real ExamsGateway Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, exams, and gateways, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Hard ExamsMany QuizzesGateway TestsTest Heavy
“ .”
MATH150
“Too many exams, quizzes, gateways (Total 20)”
MATH067
“ and difficult.”
MATH180

Online

Online reviews say the class is test heavy and that , but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Test HeavyMock Exams Differ From Real Exams
“ .”
MATH150
“Test heavy”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely obscene amounts of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Burden

8/100

“Absolutely obscene amounts of .”

⚖️

16/100

“She also grades hard on EVERYTHING.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

19/100

“If you see her .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Lots and lots and lots of and projects.
  • and online.
  • Gave enormous amounts of and written - including 200+ additional review problems 1st wk.

Theme 2

🧮 About Teaching and Exams

  • .
  • She expects students to teach themselves based on the book.
  • and difficult.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Character

  • If you reach out to her and tell her that you are struggling, she will help you!
  • .
  • She can be very rude which made it difficult to approach her at times.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

105

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across online and positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 516
3 out of 511
2 out of 516
1 out of 534

Course coverage

MATH15019 reviews
MATH06710 reviews
MATH1808 reviews
1502 reviews
MATH1702 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH672 reviews
STATS1502 reviews
0671 review
MATH1301 review
MATH801 review
STATS1 review
STATS07621 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

3

D+ 3

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2