AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Judy Kasabian

ALG1 · MATH5A · MATH73 · MATH170 · MATH115 · MATH80 · MATH120 · MATH70 · MATH60 · MATH116 · MATH73115 · 90 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
87.88%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take Kasabian in person if you struggle with math and want clear guidance, but reviews.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExcellent in personClear test prepMath made understandableCaring but strictPoor online experience
  • In-person students overwhelmingly praise Kasabian for , and strong support.
  • Online reviews are sharply negative, citing poor communication and lack of real lectures.
  • Getting an A , and studying, even though she makes math easier to understand.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic because she tells students what to study, but , and effort still matter.

, while online reviews give little positive evidence about earning grades easily.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

69/100

Math content can be challenging, but students , and exact test guidance make it much easier.

In-person classes are beginner-friendly, while online reviews say the format made the same material harder to learn.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as strictly mandatory, but students repeatedly say class notes and lectures are crucial for tests.

In-person evidence strongly favors attending class, while online evidence focuses on missing .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

because she makes math understandable and supports students who struggle.

, but online reviews directly warn against taking her online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

She gives exact test guidance and may accept late work, but and no credit for wrong answers.

Format shift

and clear with some strict complaints, while online grading leniency is not clearly supported.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and sometimes projects, but students usually call it manageable.

Format shift

as important practice, while online reviews do not provide enough workload detail beyond poor lecture support.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

In-person teaching is praised as , and effective for students who dislike or struggle with math.

Format shift

The because online reviews describe a poor remote teaching experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and quizzes, with as preparation and occasional projects in some courses.

Format shift

and tests, while online reviews mention test-heavy tags but few format details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly positive, emphasizing clear lectures, exact exam preparation, patience, humor, and strong help for math-anxious students.

Main concern

, and because tests and quizzes depend on class material.

What students said

“If .”
MATH73
“ because that's EXACTLY what'll be on the test/quiz”
MATH80

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, saying the class lacked live lectures and had weak communication and support.

Main concern

Students felt left to learn from notes or outside videos instead of direct instruction.

What students said

“She did not have live lectures or .”
MATH120
“Terrible at communicating.”
MATH170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are student-friendly in person because she tells students exactly what will be tested, but strict proctoring, open-book rules, and .

Exact Test TopicsStraightforward TestsQuizzesHomework Prepares For Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes are predictable because she tells students exactly what material and problem types will appear.

Exact Test TopicsQuizzesStraightforward Tests
“She tells you every single thing that will be on the tests and quizzes so you will never be surprised.”
MATH73
“She tells you exactly how many of what type of problems there will be and what section.”
MATH73

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If . She gives amazing lectures, she makes sure everyone understands the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ and makes sure you understand what she's teaching.”

📈 Effort And Grades

72/100

“If you study hard, you'll get an A.”

🧪

80/100

“She tells you every single thing that will be on the tests and quizzes so you will never be surprised.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and she always takes time to ensure her students understand everything before moving forward.
  • She makes math extremely simple.
  • She teaches in a simpler way than the textbook does.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Just get the textbook and DO THE HOMEWORK and you'll be fine!
  • If you show your work and put in effort it will not go unnoticed.
  • Be prepared to do work though since it is a 5 unit math class.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • She did not have live lectures or .
  • ! .
  • Terrible at communicating.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

90

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The 50 reviews span many years and strongly agree that she is excellent in person but weak online.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 574
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH7328 reviews
MATH17010 reviews
MATH802 reviews
04101 review
1151 review
Show 8 more courses
ALG11 review
MATH1151 review
MATH1161 review
MATH1201 review
MATH5A1 review
MATH601 review
MATH701 review
MATH731151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 7 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 6 · B 5

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4