AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael Zeitzew

MATH220 · MATHMATH · STATS1 · MATH170 · STATS150 · MATH150 · MATH190 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a fair and attendance usually pay off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Math ExplanationsEasy TestsCheat Sheet FriendlyExtra CreditHomework Required
  • Most in-person students describe him as , and .
  • Grades are usually very reachable because , and appears often.
  • The main risk is that homework and , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is very realistic with attendance and homework because , and supported by reviews or .

, while online evidence is too mixed to prove the same.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The math content can still require study, but and keeps tests close to practice material.

In-person students usually find the course manageable, while one online review says instruction was too limited.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is often important because class handouts, lectures, and .

In-person reviews repeatedly stress attendance, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Students recommend him because , and grade-friendly.

, while online reviews are split between praise and a strong warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Grading is lenient because students mention , and grade bumps.

Format shift

The strongest , while online evidence only mentions once.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and sometimes heavy, but students usually describe it as useful preparation rather than overwhelming.

Format shift

, while online reviews give little workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

87/100

Most students describe him as , and able to make math understandable.

Format shift

, while online teaching is mixed because one student says there was little real lecturing.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to combine homework, practice work, class participation, tests, and .

Format shift

and tests, while online evidence mentions three homework assignments, three tests, and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly favor him for , and approachable humor.

Main concern

Students still need to attend class and .

What students said

“Easy class if you show up and do the homework.”
MATH150
“Great professor, easy to understand and .”
MATH190

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between one very positive review and one warning that he did little direct lecturing.

Main concern

Online students may need to learn heavily from outside videos instead of live instruction.

What students said

“He does no real lecturing, and has you watch Professor Leonard's videos the day before class”
MATH220
“He's the best :)”
MATH220

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because many reviews mention , and practice exams, though policies vary by year.

Cheat Sheet AllowedOpen Book MentionedPractice TestsEasy TestsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

87/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as easy or note-friendly, with several reviews mentioning open-book tests, cheat sheets, or practice tests.

Cheat Sheet AllowedOpen Book MentionedPractice TestsEasy Tests
“ !!!!! and ”
MATH150
“ , but he allowed a cheat sheet (both sides).”
MATH190

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam rules, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Zeitzew is the best math teacher I have ever had. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

87/100

“ .”

📈 Easy A Path

88/100

“You can't fail unless your lazy.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

89/100

“ ! You will NOT be disappointed!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Cracks dad jokes while explaining the math in an easy and understandable manner.
  • Great professor, easy to understand and .
  • he knows his stuff and so that people actually understand!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class if you show up and do the homework.
  • the , AND he gives you a full cheat sheet front and back to use on the test.
  • GREAT TEACHER. EASY . AND GET EASY A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • He does no real lecturing, and has you watch Professor Leonard's videos the day before class
  • The hw were all from mystatslab which were all HARDER than the class's.
  • Get ready to teach yourself. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because it uses 50 reviews across many years with consistent in-person themes and only limited online evidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 519
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH15033 reviews
MATH1909 reviews
MATH2202 reviews
1501 review
1901 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1701 review
MATHMATH1 review
STATS11 review
STATS1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1