AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

S Huang

PREALGEBRA · MATH73 · MATH40 · MATH23 · MATH70 · MATH150 · MATH130 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you are comfortable with , and doing extra work on your own.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard to UnderstandStrict AttendanceConfusing TestsSome Extra CreditMixed Helpfulness
  • Most negative comments focus on difficulty understanding lectures and test directions.
  • as strict and important for passing.
  • A few students found the , and helpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible with attendance, homework, study guides, and , but and hard-to-follow lectures.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Some lower math courses are described as easy, but it should be.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and skipping class makes passing unlikely.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

29/100

Most students do not recommend her because lectures and materials.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

, but and strict expectations make it feel unforgiving.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, but students must attend, study, and use extra help to keep up.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students repeatedly describe unclear lectures, communication barriers, and effort.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, with exams still carrying major risk.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about unclear , and .

Main concern

Students often struggle to understand lectures and test directions.

What students said

“English clearly isn't her first language and it's difficult to understand her.”
MATH73
“ because each test is accumulitive and .”
MATH130
“She gives study guides which are a replica of the !”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book rules, but .

Confusing TestsStudy GuidesHard TestsShort Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests, and unclear directions, but do not clearly prove book or proctoring rules.

Confusing TestsStudy GuidesHard Tests
“She gives study guides which are a replica of the !”
MATH150
“Sometimes the ”
MATH73
“ and she tells you that she wants to seperate the A's from everyone else”
MATH130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“CANNOT UNDERSTAND A WORD SHE SAYS, IF YOU ARE ALREADY CONFUSED ABOUT MATH SHE'LL CONFUSE YOU EVEN MORE.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

36/100

“ .”

⚖️

34/100

“ because each test is accumulitive and .”

📌

12/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is hard to understand but effectively covers the material.
  • .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • because each test is accumulitive and .
  • Her lectures are super straight forward, which she then does for homework.

Theme 3

🚪 About Taking Her

  • unless you're dedicated
  • horrrrible!!
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 15 reviews over many years with consistent complaints, but most are old and only one includes a reported grade.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1304 reviews
MATH234 reviews
MATH403 reviews
MATH1501 review
MATH701 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH731 review
PREALGEBRA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values