AI Rate Professor

English

DeAnna Stansbury

ENG1A · 1C · ENGL103 · ENGLISH1A · ENGLI1C · ENG1C · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you want a demanding writing course and , and inconsistent support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough essay graderHeavy reading and writingExtra credit sometimes helpsDisorganized feedbackPolarizing teaching style
  • Many students report , and .
  • Some students say , and offers .
  • Negative reviews frequently , and harsh grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is difficult because and students , and poor grades despite effort.

Online evidence is very negative from one review, while and confirms tough grading with occasional .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course is intellectually and practically demanding because , and revision.

The online review focuses on essay penalties, while , and class discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

At least one in-person review says attendance is required or , and participation is repeatedly emphasized.

; the single online review does not clarify attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because many students describe harsh grading, unclear teaching, heavy workload, and .

The only , and in-person reviews are split but lean negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Many reviews call her a tough or , though some mention and revision opportunities.

Format shift

The online review reports a harsh missed-essay penalty, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students describe lots of reading, constant assignments, many essays, and little breathing time.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most workload evidence, while the .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students found her helpful, but many describe , and awkward interactions.

Format shift

Online evidence is negative but limited, while and polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

, but in-person reviews give much stronger detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized but , and unclear instruction.

Main concern

The main concern is a heavy workload paired with and inconsistent help.

What students said

“Plus you have eight essays overall with no breathing time in between.”
1C
“She is an but ”
ENG1C
“she's also very lenient when it comes to extending deadlines and giving .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is strongly negative and .

Main concern

The main concern is harsh consequences for missed writing work.

What students said

“if you miss one essay she will flunk you no matter how hard you try”
ENGL103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus more on essays and assignments than exams, and they .

Essay-Heavy AssessmentFinal MentionedExam Policy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test-heavy tag once, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Final MentionedTest Heavy MentionedExam Policy Not Clear
“except on the day of the final.”
ENGLI1C
“ and leaves things till last second.”
1C

Online

The online review mentions essay penalties but does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Essay PenaltyExam Policy Not Clear
“if you miss one essay she will flunk you no matter how hard you try”
ENGL103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Plus you have eight essays overall with no breathing time in between. It's overwhelming to say the least.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“her teaching style is just not good.”

⚖️

22/100

“She is an but didnt give us clear instructions about what we were supposed to write on.”

📚 Workload Load

18/100

“The lectures seem to go on forever. .”

Theme 1

📄

  • Hard essays
  • Requires a lot of reading & writing
  • Plus you have eight essays overall with no breathing time in between.
  • .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • she's also very lenient when it comes to extending deadlines and giving .
  • She's a but
  • she grades .
  • I got poor grades for them. Not all, but most of them. Usually a C/D average.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She actively teaches her classes and .
  • Poor learning service overall.
  • Lectures seem to have no real rhyme or reasoning for them
  • I am very grateful that I got to have her teaching my first English class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed, , and teaching style.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

1C6 reviews
ENG1C4 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
ENGLI1C2 reviews
ENGL1031 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

4

B 4

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1