AI Rate Professor

English

Kathleen Motoike

ENG1A · ENGL1A6434 · ENGLISH1C · ENG1B · ENG1C · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can handle unclear structure and , and questions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but disorganizedUnclear instructionsEasy if you keep upStrict attendanceMixed grading
  • Students often call her caring and understanding, but negative reviews and disorganized.
  • Getting a good grade can be manageable if you attend and and expectations feel inconsistent.
  • All reviews are in person, so there is no online comparison.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

Good grades are possible by attending and doing the work, but unclear expectations and A.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

English content is described as easy to grasp, but material itself.

, so no format difference can be assessed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One detailed review says she is strict on absences, and and success to being in class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

, but many strongly warn against her organization and teaching clarity.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some students say she wants people to pass and offers , but others report hard grading and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The class , and group work, but some students still found it manageable.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

, but repeated reports of not teaching, disorganization, and dominate the risk.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Reviews , and quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but often criticizing organization, teaching clarity, and grading transparency.

Main concern

Unclear instructions and .

What students said

“ and helpful if you reach out.”
ENG1A
“Bad professor, unclear, avoids answering questions, doesn't teach, have rubrics, give feedback on papers, or .”
ENG1B
“And she is very strict on absences, 3 and you're out.”
6471

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and in-class essays, but they do not clearly prove a .

Pop QuizzesIn-Class EssaysReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and in-class essays, but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Pop QuizzesIn-Class Essays
“3 inclass essays.”
ENG1A
“ and helpful.”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and helpful if you reach out.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“She's a nice person but not a great professor.”

👍 Recommendation Level

46/100

“ .”

⚖️

52/100

“Nothing you write is right in her eyes she has her own way of and it seems like no one can meet her expectations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and motivational.
  • and she does not follow her schedule.
  • !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do the her classes don't) and you will get a good grade.
  • So long as you attend and keep up with the work, you won't have trouble receiving an A.

Theme 3

🧭 About Structure

  • and is not helpful when you ask questions or are trying to improve.
  • didn't know my .
  • And she is very strict on absences, 3 and you're out.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve detailed in-person reviews across several years show a and serious organization issues.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1A6 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
64711 review
ENG1C1 review
ENGL1A64341 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH1C1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1