AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Gary Kohatsu

PHOTO106 · PHOTO206AB · JORN6 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want practical photojournalism experience and can handle fieldwork costs and schedule disruption.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirational photojournalistIndustry-focused projectsGood feedbackParticipation mattersHigh out-of-class cost
  • , and inspiring photojournalism perspective.
  • The course can require real field work, equipment spending, travel, and schedule flexibility.
  • , but success depends on participation and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A grades appear attainable, but students still and participate seriously.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is practical rather than abstract, but and real-world work add challenge.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person photojournalism courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters, and project work can affect schedules, but .

and schedule disruption.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students broadly recommend him for , and professional photojournalism insight.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Reported A and A+ outcomes suggest grading is favorable when students complete the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and projects can be challenging and may require time outside normal class hours.

Format shift

and equipment demands.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most comments describe him as inspiring, knowledgeable, and .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and group projects rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

inspiration and feedback but one warning about logistics and costs.

Main concern

and require extra spending.

What students said

“Very inspiring teacher.”
JORN6
“Be prepares to volunteer time, spend money on photo equipment, gas and parking.”
PHOTO206AB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book policies, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Knowledgeable, experienced photojournalist who is sharing all the essential skills of the trade with his students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, projects, and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Very inspiring teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Value

88/100

“An amazing professor.”

⚖️ Workload Reality

48/100

“Be prepares to volunteer time, spend money on photo equipment, gas and parking.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • An amazing professor.
  • Very inspiring teacher.

Theme 2

📸 About Projects

  • basically find ideas about what to capture for the paper and group projects.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed enough to show a .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

JORN61 review
PHOTO1061 review
PHOTO206AB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1