AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alexander Abatzoglou

MATH170 · MATH120 · MATH165 · MATH190 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you value patience and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardConfusing lecturesPatient and accommodatingEasy gradingMixed teaching quality
  • Students split sharply between caring support and unfocused lectures.
  • , but learning quality depends heavily on paying attention and asking questions.
  • All evidence is from in-person math courses, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Getting an A seems possible with lenient grading and , but confusion and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content is manageable for some students, but and short-session workload make it harder than a simple course.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students recommend him only if and easier grading.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students mention and , though not enough evidence shows extreme generosity.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

One review while another reports lots of .

Format shift

In-person workload reports conflict, and there is no online evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is described as patient and accommodating, but multiple students say lectures drift off topic or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention few graded items, homework, group work, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and sometimes helpful professor whose lectures can also feel confusing or off topic.

Main concern

Lecture organization is inconsistent.

What students said

“Gave him a two for being an and a nice guy, but didn't really learn anything.”
MATH170
“ , but he is more than willing to clarify any concepts that .”
MATH190
“His practice exams are very helpful 85% identical.”
MATH165

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly support helpful practice exams and .

Helpful Practice Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Helpful Practice Exams
“His practice exams are very helpful 85% identical.”
MATH165

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gave him a two for being an and a nice guy, but didn't really learn anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ , but he is more than willing to clarify any concepts that .”

⚖️

72/100

“Gave him a two for being an and a nice guy, but didn't really learn anything.”

👍 Recommendation Level

52/100

“Save yourself and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof Abatzaglou was very nervous and seemed to drone on and go off topic a lot.
  • He cannot stay on track if his life depends on it and will drone on and on about examples that are irrelevant to the class.
  • He is very attentive and but you got it hear him and pay attention to his teaching character.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , if you're taking a math class, is a bad thing.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • His practice exams are very helpful 85% identical.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but inconsistent evidence from 2017 to 2019.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1201 review
MATH1651 review
MATH1701 review
MATH1901 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values