AI Rate Professor

Engineering

R. Jafarkha

ENGR1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you can handle a self-directed, presentation-heavy class with strict classroom rules.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrict ClassroomPresentation BasedSelf Help StyleOff Topic LecturesNot Recommended
  • The class can be easy to pass because grades mainly come from two presentations.
  • The main complaint is strict classroom control and weak teaching value.
  • The only review strongly advises against taking the professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A seems manageable because though the professor is strict.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content sounds light and self-help oriented rather than intellectually demanding.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but classroom behavior rules are strict.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The only student says the class is not recommended because the professor is strict and often goes off topic.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

The A+ outcome and two-presentation grading suggest lenient grading despite strict conduct rules.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Light

75/100

Workload appears light because the main graded work is two end-of-semester presentations.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The professor is described as strict, off topic, and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears centered on speech presentations rather than exams.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person class is presentation-based and easy to pass, but the teaching is seen as low value and overly strict.

Main concern

Strict rules and off-topic lectures reduce the course value.

What students said

“Easy class majority of the grades are based on two speech presentation towards the end of the semester”
ENGR1
“He's strict no talking, cell.”
ENGR1
“ .”
ENGR1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review mentions presentations but does not clearly prove an .

Presentation Based AssessmentReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“majority of the grades are based on two speech presentation”
ENGR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy class majority of the grades are based on two speech presentation towards the end of the semester”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He like to go off tangent a lot of times.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

78/100

“Easy class majority of the grades are based on two speech presentation towards the end of the semester”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He like to go off tangent a lot of times.
  • Its a self help class.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Easy class majority of the grades are based on two speech presentation towards the end of the semester
  • you would research and present to the whole class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Rules

  • He's strict no talking, cell.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one older review is available, so .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGR11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values