AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Shireetha Gethers

CHDV103 · CHILDD103 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Choose her mainly for , and be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderWriting HeavyOnline ProblemsOpen Book TestsMixed Experience
  • Online reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear directions, slow responses, writing load, and .
  • and describe open-book or cheat-sheet-friendly tests.
  • The grade path depends heavily on format, with and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Good grades are possible, but students describe heavy writing, tough grading, and missed .

Online evidence points to much higher effort, while but .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content can be manageable, but , and fast summer pacing raise the challenge.

Online sections sound more burdensome than in-person .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is not uniformly described as mandatory, but .

, while online reviews focus on responsiveness and workload.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Students strongly warn against online sections, while .

Online reviews are mostly negative, while but more favorable overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Several students cite tough , and grading scale changes.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize and grading problems, while and strict grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is heavy because students , and observations.

Format shift

Online workload is especially heavy, while but .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Teaching feedback is sharply mixed, with online students reporting poor support and in-person students praising creativity and openness.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is mostly negative, while the latest strict-grading complaint.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and participation-style work.

Format shift

Online reviews stress papers, tests, and observations, while , and reflection days.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split, with older students praising open-book tests and creativity while the .

Main concern

if major activities or .

What students said

“2 tests all year: .”
CHDV103
“ and open notes.”
CHDV103
“she is a and does not offer .”
CHILDD103
“she changed the of the session”
CHILDD103

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report heavy reading and , and grading system problems.

Main concern

Online support and .

What students said

“ .”
CHDV103
“WAY TOO MUCH WRITING.”
CHDV103
“she doesn't give much direction for her online class.”
CHDV103
“There was a lot of reading (like 60-page chapters every 3-4 days!)”
CHILDD103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

as open book, open notes, or cheat-sheet friendly, while online exam rules are not .

Open Book TestsOpen Notes TestsCheat Sheet AllowedMidterm And FinalReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly describe student-friendly tests using cheat sheets, open book, and open notes.

Open Book TestsOpen Notes TestsCheat Sheet AllowedMidterm And Final
“2 tests all year: .”
CHDV103
“Both she lets you use a cheat sheet”
CHDV103
“ and open notes.”
CHDV103
“ .”
CHILDD103

Online

Online reviews mention many tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Many TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Proctoring
“There were so many tests and a few papers.”
CHILDD103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ . I enjoyed her class.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“WAY TOO MUCH WRITING.”

⚖️

30/100

“she changed the of the session which wasn't fair !”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • she doesn't give much direction for her online class.
  • .
  • .
  • The website had so many problems the entire semester with the grading.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • There was a lot of reading (like 60-page chapters every 3-4 days!)
  • WAY TOO MUCH WRITING.
  • If you miss one project it will bring your grade down tremendously.
  • she is a and does not offer .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • Both she lets you use a cheat sheet
  • and open notes.
  • .
  • There were so many tests and a few papers.

Theme 4

👨‍🏫

  • Great teacher, don't know how you COULDNT pass!
  • Very open minded teacher & open to others opinions and discussion.
  • she's creative with class lectures and projects
  • She is an amazing professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across online and , but opinions vary strongly by format and year.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHDV1036 reviews
CHILDD1033 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1