AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Paulette Baumgardner

COSA5 · CIS13 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you like the subject and can work independently, but if you need active guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProKind PersonalityBoring LecturesBy The BookLimited HelpFrequent Quizzes
  • Student opinion is split between warm praise for her personality and serious criticism that lectures are boring and unclear.
  • The course may be easier for students already comfortable with computers and technology.
  • Frequent quizzes and limited help are recurring concerns in the negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

The class does not sound harshly graded, but and limited help keep it from being an effortless A.

Only in-person reviews exist, so all .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content may feel manageable for tech-comfortable students but harder for .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention enjoying class and quizzes every time, but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist and none clearly states the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

She is worth considering for independent or tech-interested students, but several reviews warn that her teaching support is weak.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

One review says she is not harsh and , though grade outcome evidence is limited.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload appears steady because one review reports quizzes every class, but there is .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching is mixed because some students praise her knowledge and kindness while others and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they conflict.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews emphasize frequent quizzes and lab/class work more than major exams, but the .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and knowledge but complaints about boring lectures, limited help, and frequent quizzes.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ .”
CIS13
“Shes not harsh at all.”
COSA5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention quizzes every class but do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

Frequent Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or book policy.

Frequent Quizzes
“ .”
CIS13

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you like computers and technology then you will love her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ .”

⚖️

70/100

“Shes not harsh at all.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

65/100

“if you like computers and technology then you will love her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Wish she wasn't so by the .
  • .

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She's a wonderful Professor, her class was so fun.
  • Mrs. Baumgardener is such a nice lady.
  • She understands there a human being on the other end of the email.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Support

  • .
  • she doesn't help at all.
  • We're not all computer savvy, so it would help if she actually explained more

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

but inconsistent detail, with no online evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS133 reviews
COSA51 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values