AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gizaw Taddele

MATH80 · MATH40 · MATH73 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid Gizaw Taddele unless and are willing to seek help outside normal instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lessonsHeavy homeworkTest heavyLittle extra creditHelpful after class
  • , and weak teaching support.
  • The only positive review says he is sweet and helpful after class, but still expects students to know material without much teaching.
  • Recommendation evidence is very weak, with no .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A appears difficult because reviews mention unclear teaching, lots of , and no .

There are no online reviews, so all .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content feels harder because and pacing misses what students need most.

There are no online reviews, so course difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe the .

There are no online reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students mostly do not recommend him because , and support feels limited.

There are no online reviews, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Reviews mention tough , and no clear evidence of leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

The strongest workload evidence says there is a bunch of homework and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students describe unclear lessons, poor pacing, weak articulation, and limited teaching despite some willingness to help after class.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews evaluate teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The available tags identify the course as role.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

of homework, and limited support during lessons.

Main concern

because lessons are described as .

What students said

“ and always goes either too slow on parts that are easy or too fast on parts that are hard.”
MATH80
“There is a bunch of homework and no opportunities.”
MATH80
“He's kinda expects you to know what your doing with out any teaching lol”
MATH40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The heavy, with no proof of open-book, closed-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Test HeavyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews identify the course as test heavy but do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy
“TEST HEAVY”
MATH80

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and always goes either too slow on parts that are easy or too fast on parts that are hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“he should articulate because it is hard to remain atentative”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“There is a bunch of homework and no opportunities.”

👎 Recommendation Level

18/100

“He doesnt seem to care about his students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and always goes either too slow on parts that are easy or too fast on parts that are hard.
  • He's kinda expects you to know what your doing with out any teaching lol

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a bunch of homework and no opportunities.

Theme 3

🤝 About Support

  • if you stay after for help he will be more than willing to help you.
  • He doesnt seem to care about his students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only three reviews are available, they span many years, and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH401 review
MATH731 review
MATH801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values