AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

J. Kasabian

MATH170 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor explanationsTest heavyTough graderLecture heavy
  • The only review strongly warns against taking the professor.
  • The student .
  • and test-heavy assessment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Getting an A looks very hard because the only reported grade is C+ and the and poor instruction.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The math course appears intellectually difficult because the student .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

The review tags the professor as a and reports a C+ in a difficult class.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The course is tagged test heavy and lecture heavy, with no evidence of light workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The student says the professor talks a lot but .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

The review tags the class as test heavy.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says lectures do not help with the work.

Main concern

The main risk is poor explanation in a very difficult, test-heavy class.

What students said

“Talks a lot, but .”
MATH170
“ .”
MATH170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support a test-heavy class but do not .

Test Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but not specific exam rules.

Test Heavy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Talks a lot, but . NEVER take this professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Talks a lot, but .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ .”

🧪 Assessment Load

90/100

“Talks a lot, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Talks a lot, but .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Talks a lot, but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the signal is strong but thin.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1701 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values