AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Tisa Casas

REARNING · ED41 · EDEV41 · HUMDVT10 · HUMAND10 · HDEV10 · HUMANDEV8 · HUDV10 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid Casas for HDEV unless , and a heavy self-managed workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent experienceHeavy handoutsStrict rulesBoring lecturesUnclear teaching
  • Recent HDEV reviews are , and strict grading rules.
  • Older reviews are much more positive, especially for different courses, creating a split profile.
  • Even students who earned A grades describe the class as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments describe heavy work, strict penalties, and .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The subject may not be inherently impossible, but students report , and rushed quizzes.

, and recent HDEV comments make the course feel challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Reviews warn not to be late on test day or due dates because students may .

Attendance and deadline .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Recent reviews strongly discourage the class because of , and too much work.

and split by time, with recent HDEV reviews much more negative than older ones.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report , and no allowance for late tests or papers.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Recent reviews describe many handouts, lots of reading, and so much work that it interferes with other assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Positive older comments exist, but recent HDEV reviews repeatedly call the , and not engaging.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is all in-person and varies strongly by course and year.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and at least one older course with no tests.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments, and the structure appears to vary by course.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with recent Human Development comments , and rushed quizzes.

Main concern

Students report , and harsh penalties for missed or incorrectly submitted assignments.

What students said

“shes gives so much work dont have ”
HDEV10
“She isn't aneffective professor, PERIOD!”
HDEV10
“ so ever.”
HDEV10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe rushed quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Rushed QuizzesStrict Test TimingNo Late Test AccessNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say quizzes may allow only about 10 minutes and late students may .

Rushed QuizzesStrict Test TimingNo Late Test Access
“When it comes to testexams she gives a miminum of 10 mins no matter the length.”
HDEV10
“The quizes she only gives us like 10 minutes which is definetly not enough time.”
HUMAND10
“do ”
2489

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so ever.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and mixed course experiences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Boring and uninteresting class. Not engaging”

⚖️

18/100

“if you do ANY of your homework in pencil you receive an automatic 0.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“shes gives so much work dont have ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • boring class not engaging
  • She isn't aneffective professor, PERIOD!
  • Her teaching stratigies are off and unclear.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you have a A .
  • if you do ANY of your homework in pencil you receive an automatic 0.
  • The quizes she only gives us like 10 minutes which is definetly not enough time.

Theme 3

🔀 About Mixed Experiences

  • She makes classroom learning fun one of a kind and united.
  • good teacher
  • her work and no test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews provide useful evidence, but opinions are split across years and courses, with recent HDEV reviews carrying the strongest warning.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HDEV105 reviews
24891 review
ED411 review
EDEV411 review
HUDV101 review
Show 4 more courses
HUMAND101 review
HUMANDEV81 review
HUMDVT101 review
REARNING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1