AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Doug Glenn

ECON1 · CADD32 · CAD32 · CADD33 · CATIA · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can practice independently, but if you need constant structure and instructor presence.

Best fit · Self Taught ProClear LecturesReal World ApplicationsInconsistent PresencePractice RequiredMixed Reviews
  • Positive reviews praise clear , and real-world applications.
  • Negative reviews warn that he may be absent from the classroom and not helpful for students who need direct teaching.
  • CATIA/CAD courses may be manageable with self-practice, but the learning experience is inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Grades appear attainable because difficulty ratings are mostly low and one student earned an A, but success depends on practice.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The course content is manageable for many students, though CATIA requires practice and some students felt they learned little.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, but one review says the professor .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Many reviews are positive, but sharp complaints about absence and weak teaching make the recommendation conditional.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

because reported difficulty is low and an A is documented, though grade data is sparse.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload appears moderate because students emphasize .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Teaching is good for independent students, but the experience is inconsistent due to complaints about absence and disengagement.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus on , and applications, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

teaching and others criticizing absence and poor learning support.

Main concern

Instructor presence and teaching consistency are the main concerns.

What students said

“Glenn is not bad at teaching CATIA.”
CAD32
“This instructor is not interested in teaching.”
CADD32
“The and ask professor questions.”
CAD32

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the style.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format, midterms, finals, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The and ask professor questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, independence, and consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

70/100

“Glenn is not bad at teaching CATIA.”

⚠️ Consistency Risk

45/100

“This instructor is not interested in teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good professor.
  • .
  • Glenn is not bad at teaching CATIA.

Theme 2

🧭 About Independence

  • The and ask professor questions.
  • I think his class did this.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • He is very seldom in the classroom.
  • No one knows where he is.
  • Stay D'hell away from this guy if you really want to learn something and keep your precious job!!! Period!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are seven reviews across many years, but several are old, brief, or conflicting.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CAD322 reviews
CATIA2 reviews
CADD321 review
CADD331 review
ECON11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values