AI Rate Professor

English

Janet Madden

ENG1A · ENG15A · ENG6541 · 1A · HUM1 · ENG27 · ENG6444 · ENG6316 · ENG6330 · ENG1 · ENG6379 · ENGLISH1C · ENG101 · ENGL1A · ENGLI1B · ENGL1 · ENGLI27 · ENGLI1A · ENG1C · 127 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
91.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want to become a stronger writer and can handle firm standards, deadlines, and real effort.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExceptional feedbackTough but fairHeavy writingClear expectationsStrict deadlines
  • , and ability to improve writing.
  • The class requires serious reading, writing, and analytical effort rather than passive completion.
  • Online reviews are more mixed, mainly because of , and less visible instructor presence in some courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

High grades are common and meet deadlines, but the A , and discipline.

In-person reviews make the reward-for-effort pattern very strong, while online reviews add and deadlines.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is intellectually demanding because it requires deep thinking, analytical writing, and close reading.

and writing growth, while online reviews describe weekly discussions and essays.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, and deadlines, though some later-course comments say attendance became more flexible.

, while online reviews focus on keeping up with due dates.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students highly recommend her because her demanding feedback and .

, while online recommendations are positive but more conditional.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

She grades tough but explains criteria clearly and , and to help students improve.

Format shift

Both formats mention tough grading, with online comments sounding slightly harsher.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The , and revision, but students usually see it as meaningful rather than busy work.

Format shift

and reading, while online work adds weekly discussions and deadline tracking.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly describe her as clear, insightful, dedicated, and unusually strong .

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is stronger and more enthusiastic, while online evidence still praises responsiveness and clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is mainly essay and writing based, with some online courses mentioning discussions and two essay-style exams.

Format shift

and research papers, while online reviews mention weekly posts, discussions, and essay tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews strongly emphasize excellent , and demanding but rewarding work.

Main concern

Students who procrastinate or dislike reading and revision may struggle.

What students said

“Her lectures were awesome and she really involved students in discussions.”
ENG1A
“ but she is there to help”
ENG1
“Doing the !”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise clear expectations, quick responses, , and interesting work, but and strict deadlines.

Main concern

Online students must manage weekly tasks, deadlines, and .

What students said

“Super quick response to emails.”
ENG1C
“ but she does grade tough.”
ENG1C
“Make sure you check times and due dates because it's easy to miss an assignment.”
HUM1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , with no clear evidence of strict proctoring, webcam rules, or Lockdown Browser.

Essay-Based TestsWeekly DiscussionsExtra CreditNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize essays, drafts, research papers, and .

EssaysResearch PaperDraft ConferencesExtra Credit
“She assigns 4 essays & 1 research paper, & offers EC.”
1A
“we had 3 regular essays and a .”
ENG1C
“She offered in class conferencing with ”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews mention weekly discussions and essay tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Weekly DiscussionsEssay TestsExtra CreditNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ and you get opportunities.”
HUM1
“ week”
HUM1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“NEVER have I had anyone sit down with me and go through my writing making suggestions, explaining why things were wrong and encouraging me to push myself to do better.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Her lectures were awesome and she really involved students in discussions.”

✍️

94/100

“Will help with typed drafts for every essay.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ if you want to become a better writer ! She's amazing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will teach you how to write an essay and her method actually works.
  • Amazing insights.
  • She has an excellent command of the English language and gets high marks for communicating.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Tough but good teacher.
  • but she does grade tough.
  • Deep, deep thinking required but .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Character

  • She is there to guide every step.
  • Really wants her students to learn and succeed.
  • Lots of one on one personal help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

127

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 detailed reviews across online and , rigor, and writing growth.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 585
4 out of 520
3 out of 59
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG1A15 reviews
ENG1C5 reviews
HUM15 reviews
ENGL1A4 reviews
ENG13 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ENG1013 reviews
1A2 reviews
ENG15A2 reviews
ENG271 review
ENG63161 review
ENG63301 review
ENG63791 review
ENG64441 review
ENG65411 review
ENGL11 review
ENGLI1A1 review
ENGLI1B1 review
ENGLI271 review
ENGLISH1C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 12

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2