AI Rate Professor

History

Emily Rader

HIST2342 · HIST101 · HIST2337 · HIST108 · HISTORY108 · HIST102 · HISTORY102 · HIST1022342 · HIS102 · HISTORY101 · 157 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you are a strong writer who wants a and can manage vague expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderVague AssignmentsHeavy ReadingWriting IntensiveStrict Classroom
  • Most in-person reviews strongly warn that her , and graded harshly.
  • Students often describe heavy reading, papers, weekly tests or quizzes, and .
  • A few serious students say she is knowledgeable and fair if you read carefully, ask questions, and use office hours.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

An A is possible for strong students, but comments , and constant attention to instructions.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The history material becomes difficult because assignments are vague, reading is heavy, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, so difficulty reflects classroom evidence only.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but many comments say being present, taking notes, and participating are important to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because the , and poorly rewarded for the effort required.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and say small writing errors or vague requirements can severely hurt grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews describe lots of reading, long papers, weekly tests or quizzes, and .

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students praise her knowledge, but , and unhelpful interactions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Courses appear to use a mix of , and participation, with some sections having no tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews consistently describe a strict, writing-heavy course with and .

Main concern

The main risk is a poor effort-to-reward , and .

What students said

“ and make no sense.”
HIST102
“I had to work really hard to get an A.”
HISTORY102
“You will have a in that week.”
HIST108

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam format varies by course, with some reviews reporting weekly or major tests and others reporting no tests, so reviews do not prove a .

Weekly TestsMajor TestsNo Tests In Some SectionsResearch Papers

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence conflicts across sections, with some students reporting weekly or major tests and others saying there were no tests.

Weekly TestsMajor TestsNo Tests In Some SectionsResearch Papers
“You will have a in that week.”
HIST108
“She has 2 major papers and 2 major tests.”
HISTORY102
“ .”
HIST108

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You honestly have to dedicate yourself to this class and only this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ and .”

⚖️

18/100

“Professor Rader graders like a SAVAGE.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“You really need to put a lot of effect into this one class and it really is exhausting.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She would lectured in a hurry and not very .
  • Professor Rader really loves History and she expects her students to also enjoy the subject.
  • Dr. Rader is really knowledgable about the subject, but she does grade hard.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I had to work really hard to get an A.
  • .
  • She grades tough, but if you work really hard, you'll get a good grade.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • She would not be straight up and assignments.
  • and make no sense.
  • Her class is by no means easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

157

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The review set is large, detailed, and and workload, though course requirements vary by section.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 516
3 out of 527
2 out of 543
1 out of 539

Course coverage

HIST10116 reviews
HIST1029 reviews
HIST1085 reviews
HIS1024 reviews
1013 reviews
Show 9 more courses
HISTORY1083 reviews
HISTORY1012 reviews
HISTORY1022 reviews
23151 review
23421 review
23511 review
HIST10223421 review
HIST23371 review
HIST23421 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 2