AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robert L. Horvath

ALGEBRA · MATH70 · MATH140 · MATH0780 · MATH220 · MATH0652 · MATH80 · MATH191 · CALCULUS · STATISTICS · MATH190 · MATH0634 · MATHMATH · STAT · STATS150 · MATH150 · MSC208 · MATH · MATH161 · MATH270 · 63 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are comfortable learning math independently and using .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesSelf-teaching requiredStudy-guide based examsFast paceDisorganized
  • Many students say , and .
  • because study guides closely match the tests.
  • , and teaching yourself.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Getting an A , and study guides, but students often must learn the material on their own.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content feels harder because , and assume prior knowledge.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance appears important in several reviews, and .

, and they suggest low flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students warn against taking him because the .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

but study guides, crib sheets, and occasional .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students frequently describe him as knowledgeable but , and ineffective at explaining concepts.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades appear driven mainly by exams, quizzes, and tests, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe weak lectures but .

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves because .

What students said

“ as a last option.”
MATH190
“basically if and use .”
80
“If you can teach yourself, then this is the class for you.”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often student-friendly because study guides and crib sheets are repeatedly described as closely matching test content.

Study Guides Match ExamsCrib Sheets AllowedCalculator AllowedTest-Based Grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and some use of crib sheets, but they do not clearly prove open-book exams or proctoring rules.

Study Guides Match ExamsCrib Sheets AllowedCalculator Allowed
“ .”
MATH190
“he also gives u study guides and lets u use a calc and crib sheet.”
MATH270
“ problems.”
MATH70

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He does not TEACH, but instead does the problems on the board.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“He does not TEACH, but instead does the problems on the board.”

📘

78/100

“the .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

25/100

“ if you can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .
  • Instructor teaches as if students already know the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you can do the study guide you can get a B or higher on the exam.
  • Very easy to get an A if you study and follow his study guide.
  • if you want an A.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • .
  • sheet to put formulas on and sometimes even example problems.
  • HE .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

63

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

, though some reviews are old and opinions vary.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 511
3 out of 514
2 out of 516
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH1508 reviews
MATH1908 reviews
MATH806 reviews
MATH2704 reviews
MATH1403 reviews
Show 17 more courses
MATH2 reviews
MATH2202 reviews
MATH702 reviews
STATISTICS2 reviews
2701 review
801 review
ALGEBRA1 review
CALCULUS1 review
MATH06341 review
MATH06521 review
MATH07801 review
MATH1611 review
MATH1911 review
MATHMATH1 review
MSC2081 review
STAT1 review
STATS1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values