AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

R Reece

MATH170 · MATH80 · MATH120 · MATH67 · MATH6010 · MATH50C · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and can tolerate a lot of assignments and uneven organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentHeavy homework loadGenerous gradingUnorganized lecturesResponsive help
  • Students often call him caring and helpful, but .
  • Grades can be manageable because of , study guides, and , but the workload is often heavy.
  • The in-person record is mixed, while the single online review is very positive about flexibility and support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is , and completing many assignments, but students repeatedly warn that the work cannot be ignored.

Online evidence suggests high flexibility, while heavy assignment volume.

Is the course easy?

Standard

51/100

The math content is sometimes described as manageable, but and disorganization make the course feel harder than the material itself.

The online review is positive and supportive, while and confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

The online review says he does not mark students absent or late, but flexible attendance policy.

Online evidence clearly supports flexibility, while rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Students recommend him for care, help, and grade support, but many hesitate because of , and workload.

The single online review strongly recommends him, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Several students , and many point opportunities, despite some complaints about unfair grading.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions late homework acceptance, while in-person evidence and test structure.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly describe lots of , and MyMathLab assignments.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions quizzes, exams, study guides, and , while .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

He is often caring and responsive, but teaching quality is weakened and poor organization.

Format shift

Online evidence is strongly positive, while and very poor organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to combine homework, journals, , and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions quizzes and exams, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a caring professor with , but frequent complaints about disorganization, unclear teaching, and heavy work.

Main concern

Many students say the workload is excessive and .

What students said

“He may assign A LOT of HW, but don't you want a CHANCE on passing?”
MATH120
“ and provides a lot of additional resources”
MATH120
“ and is super unorganized.”
MATH67

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review describes him as caring, flexible, and .

Main concern

The evidence is only one review, so online reliability is limited.

What students said

“he cares about the students such a heart warming professor and very understanding”
MATH80
“he doesn't mark you absent or late (bonus)”
MATH80
“ ”
MATH80

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest standard exams made easier by study guides, practice materials, or formula support, but .

Study GuidesPractice ExamsMultiple ExamsFinal ExamFormula Sheet Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

61/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, mocks, and a formula sheet, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Study GuidesPractice ExamsFinal ExamFormula Sheet Mentioned
“ .”
MATH120
“ and but he gave mocks”
MATH50C
“He gives you a the test”
MATH170

Online

The online review says quizzes and exams have study guides, but it does not clearly prove proctoring, .

Study GuidesQuizzesExams
“ and exams but prior to that, you have study guides”
MATH80

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“He cares a lot about his students so and grades very generously.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“He may assign A LOT of HW, but don't you want a CHANCE on passing?”

⚖️

70/100

“he offers a 50 !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and provides a lot of additional resources
  • His and tedious, and he is very unorganized.
  • He does good lectures but he can be forgetful and unorganized.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The material itself is not difficult.
  • .
  • Definitely the easiest math professor I've ever had.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • .
  • If quickly!
  • ! So patient with students who do not understand anything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The 27 reviews span many years and give , and organization problems.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH12019 reviews
MATH674 reviews
MATH1701 review
MATH50C1 review
MATH60101 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1