AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charles Fogel

MATH190 · MATH80 · MATH180 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can teach and want a class where homework support may help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed teaching qualityOnline homeworkTough testsOptional homeworkLaidback for some
  • Student experiences are sharply mixed, from laidback and easy to unable to teach.
  • and may be optional or supported by built-in help.
  • Tests and teaching clarity are the main risk, especially in lower-level math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Good grades are possible, but and weak teaching can make the A .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews; online class review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Some students found the class easy, while others struggled because and tests were tough.

Only in-person course evidence exists, and it is mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , though course.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends strongly on course and because comments range from .

All and is highly split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Reported grades are strong, but and limited extra-credit value keep grading from looking lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

and sometimes optional, but one review calls the .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

46/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with two positive reviews outweighed and poor help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

weekly quizzes and as supporting work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are inconsistent, with some students calling the class easy and and .

Main concern

Teaching clarity and test difficulty vary heavily by course and student.

What students said

“Nice person but cannot teach.”
MATH80
“I found the class pretty easy.”
MATH190

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and , but and proctoring are not consistently proven.

Weekly QuizzesTests Bulk Of GradePossible Online TestsTough Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention weekly quizzes, tests as the bulk of the grade, and sometimes online tests, but .

Weekly QuizzesTests Bulk Of GradePossible Online TestsTough Tests
“ but if you're current with the homework; it shouldn't be too bad.”
MATH180
“ ”
MATH80
“ classwork as a small percentage.”
MATH190

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Most of class dropped. Nice person but cannot teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“Nice person but cannot teach.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

58/100

“I found the class pretty easy.”

🧪

78/100

“ classwork as a small percentage.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures were pretty good.
  • .
  • He went over students' questions (mostly on homework) at the beginning of each class.

Theme 2

📚

  • Overall it's a laidback class
  • (but )

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews provide specific details, but duplicate-like comments and sharply mixed ratings limit confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1802 reviews
MATH1901 review
MATH801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 1 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values