AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Mark Arnold

AOJ170 · AJ000 · AJ2652 · AJ170 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can attend every class and keep detailed notes, because the teaching is strong but the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong oral lecturesChallenging testsNote-heavy classReal courtroom experience
  • Students consistently describe him as a strong and informative lecturer.
  • Grades depend heavily on attending class, taking fast notes, and studying those notes.
  • workload suggests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A decent grade is realistic if , and study, but the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The content is explained clearly and with examples, but the note-heavy lectures and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

as mandatory, but missing class means missing test material.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, which repeatedly stress attending class.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Students generally recommend him because his lectures are strong, informative, and grounded in real experience.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and fair if students study lecture notes, but not especially lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

The workload seems light because reviews focus on lectures, notes, and tests rather than many assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students praise his lectures, examples, friendliness, and professional judge experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Reviews say grades are driven mainly or .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise his lectures and real-world credibility, but warn that .

Main concern

Missing class or writing slowly can hurt because .

What students said

“Must be ready to write fast since his lectures are only vocal.”
AJ170
“Expect .”
AJ000

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and often challenging, while reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Lecture-Based TestsChallenging TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Lecture-Based TestsChallenging Tests
“ but he goes over everything in his lectures.”
AJ2652
“You are graded solely on the test in class”
AJ170

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and study a bit for the tests and you will get a decent grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Very good instructor. Good lectures.”

📝 Test Difficulty

48/100

“Watch out for .”

📌

35/100

“If you miss a class, you risk missing some important info that will usually be on the tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good lectures.
  • Gives examples to everything.
  • He is always willing to go into further detail on any concept he is teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expect .
  • Just study your notes and you'll do fine.
  • You are graded solely on the test in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six consistent but and tests, with limited grade data.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AJ1703 reviews
AJ0001 review
AJ26521 review
AOJ1701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values