AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Jim Lemmon

ARCH121 · REV1453 · ARCHTIECTURE · ENIV7520 · ARCH104 · REVIT1478 · ARCH · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

He is a strong pick for students who want an a strong grade.

Best fit · Easy A HunterExpert in the fieldEasy A potentialTake-home quizzesCaring and clearSustainability focus
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as expert, caring, and highly recommendable.
  • Many reviews call the class easy, with and manageable exams.
  • A small minority found him boring or difficult for slower students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Many students report , and easy A outcomes, though some say an A still needs a little effort.

, while the single online review only confirms an A+ and supportiveness.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students often describe the class as easy and detailed.

In-person reviews strongly describe easy course structure, while online evidence is positive but too limited to compare deeply.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

One in-person review says attendance is 10% of the grade, while the online review .

Online format appears more flexible due to recorded lectures, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him for expertise, clarity, kindness, and strong grade outcomes.

Both formats are positive, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Multiple reviews mention easy A , and papers that are not graded harshly.

Format shift

, with one online A+ but little grading detail.

Workload

Light

82/100

Work , and a manageable final.

Format shift

, while the online review does not give enough workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Most students , and one of the best professors in the program.

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, with .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and finals, so assessments are mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Assessment details .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews repeatedly praise , and take-home assessments.

Main concern

A few students found lectures boring or harder for slower learners, but this is not the dominant pattern.

What students said

“EASY A”
ARCH104
“no need to study hard.”
ARCH

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review is very positive and says recorded lectures help students who cannot attend live.

Main concern

Only , so online-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“Lectures are recorded if you're not able to make a class.”
REVIT1478

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are often described as , though current online proctoring rules are not clearly proven.

Take-Home QuizzesOpen-Note Final MentionedMultiple Choice FinalRecorded LecturesNo Clear Online Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe take-home quizzes, a multiple-choice final, and , though one review says the .

Take-Home QuizzesMultiple Choice FinalOpen-Note Final MentionedNo Longer Open-Note Mentioned
“ and lectures are a little hard to get through but .”
ARCH104
“ .”
ARCH104
“ but still not too hard class”
ARCH104

Online

The online review mentions recorded lectures but does not clearly prove .

Recorded LecturesNo Clear Online Exam Policy
“Lectures are recorded if you're not able to make a class.”
REVIT1478

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Best professor in the Architecture Department. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“He truly cares about his students and want's everyone to succeed.”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“EASY A”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ ! Awesome.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Makes difficult subjects easy to understand.
  • He is fun and easy.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you'll laugh your way to an A.
  • no need to study hard.
  • needs a little effort if u want an A

Theme 3

🧪 About Assessments

  • Lots of .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews over many years show a strong, consistent positive pattern with , and assessments.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCH1049 reviews
ARCH2 reviews
ARCH1212 reviews
ARCHTIECTURE2 reviews
REVIT14782 reviews
Show 3 more courses
1021 review
ENIV75201 review
REV14531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 4 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values