AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Juan Leon

CS3 · CSCI1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless and spend a lot of time on labs, assignments, and quizzes.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesVery heavy workloadHard assignmentsFrequent quizzesNot an easy A
  • Both reviews describe the class as very difficult and time-consuming.
  • Teaching quality is weak because and .
  • Labs may help prepare students, but assignments and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

A student explicitly says it is not an easy A and the workload requires a lot of time and work.

All Easy A evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The computer science material feels hard because assignments are difficult and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly prove .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Students report , and high effort for poor reward.

Recommendation and is negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

The comments do not praise grading leniency and , and difficulty earning an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Students mention , and a lot of time required.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload, and .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Lectures are described as monotone, slide-based, and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment appears driven by labs, assignments, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews mention labs, assignments, and quizzes but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe unclear slide-based lectures, , and a poor path to an A.

Main concern

The main risk is needing to learn difficult material with limited lecture support.

What students said

“He isn't a very good lecturer.”
CS3
“He gives a lot of labs which are sometimes easy but prepare you for .”
CSCI1
“ if your planning to put in a lot of time and work . Not an easy A”
CSCI1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention regular quizzes but do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, proctoring, or closed-book policies.

Frequent QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

two, but exam policy is otherwise not clearly proven.

Frequent Quizzes
“You have a you must read the book.”
CSCI1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if your planning to put in a lot of time and work . Not an easy A”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grade difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“He isn't a very good lecturer.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

12/100

“ if your planning to put in a lot of time and work . Not an easy A”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“He gives a lot of labs which are sometimes easy but prepare you for .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He talks in a very low/monotone voice and read off the slides.
  • When a student asks a question he simply replies with a "yes" or "no" rather than clarifying.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • He gives a lot of labs which are sometimes easy but prepare you for .
  • You have a you must read the book.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if your planning to put in a lot of time and work . Not an easy A
  • He isn't a very good lecturer.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the negative pattern is clear but based on limited evidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CS31 review
CSCI11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1