AI Rate Professor

History

Florence Baker

HISTORY162 · HISTORY141 · HISTWREL · HISTORY145 · HIST3 · HISTORY143 · HIST141 · HIS140 · HIST2371 · HIST120 · HIS141 · HIST140 · HISTO5 · HIST37 · HIST162 · HISTORY140 · HIST2382 · HIST143 · HIST145 · 94 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can tolerate slow lecture-heavy classes and are .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDry long lecturesHelpful in office hoursTough essay graderTake-home essaysLow speaking voice
  • Students consistently describe Baker as kind and .
  • The course is but .
  • Lectures are often described as boring, quiet, and hard to stay focused on.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Passing can be easy with office hours and , but an A and strict formatting.

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The history content is not usually described as conceptually hard, but the .

, so no format contrast is available.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

and sometimes , but reviews do not prove a strict mandatory policy.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students split between appreciating her help and warning others away because of boring lectures and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students and expects very specific formatting.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

There is , but .

Format shift

but important papers.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

She is knowledgeable and caring, but many students find her lectures dry, quiet, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades , and very few traditional tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a kind but dry lecturer whose grades .

Main concern

and lecture engagement is weak.

What students said

“ and she grades really tough make sure to follow all instructions.”
HIST162
“ and very nice, but SO boring.”
HIST140
“ .”
HIST145

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and online quizzes, making exams structurally student-friendly despite tough grading.

Take-Home TestsEssay ExamsOnline QuizzesNo Clearly Proven Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and online quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Take-Home TestsEssay ExamsOnline Quizzes
“ .”
HIST145
“ .”
HIST140
“ as many times as possible)”
HIST140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and very nice, but SO boring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“She's a really nice, approachable professor who really pushes you to see her during office hours and will help with all of the , but her in-class lectures are really dry.”

⚖️

32/100

“ and she grades really tough make sure to follow all instructions.”

📝

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dry, dry, dry would be the .
  • and very nice, but SO boring.
  • She speaks softly so i would suggest to sit close to the front of the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a but at least if she sees you trying hard she will give at least a C.
  • She grades hard on them.
  • An easy A if you do the work and do it well.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • Grade is based on 3 take-home as many times as possible), and attendance.
  • only 3 papers which she grades fairly and you have 2 weeks to write .
  • The essays do not make .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

94

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The 50 reviews span many years and show consistent themes , and grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 517
3 out of 521
2 out of 58
1 out of 511

Course coverage

HIST1407 reviews
HIST1417 reviews
HIST1456 reviews
HIST1625 reviews
HISTORY1623 reviews
Show 17 more courses
HIS1402 reviews
HIST1202 reviews
HIST1432 reviews
HIST32 reviews
HIST372 reviews
1621 review
24201 review
24381 review
HIS1411 review
HIST23711 review
HIST23821 review
HISTO51 review
HISTORY1401 review
HISTORY1411 review
HISTORY1431 review
HISTORY1451 review
HISTWREL1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

4

B 4

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1