AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Jessica Schilling-Wiggley

CHILD150 · CDEV160 · CDEV152 · CD160 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you are comfortable with a strongly opinionated teaching style and are willing to attend and do the work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingAutism-FocusedHeavy For Unit ValueAttendance MattersExtra Credit
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found her inspiring and students who felt dismissed.
  • The class can produce an A, but , and more work than expected.
  • The strongest concern is her communication style and whether students feel allowed to question her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible with , and completed work, but it is not described as effortless.

All evidence comes from four in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The , but one review says the workload was high for a one-unit class.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they give mixed signals about difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because positive grade outcomes are tied to attending, listening, and paying attention.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is weak because negative reviews describe poor student care and a rigid classroom tone despite some positive outcomes.

All and is highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades can be good with work and , but one student felt disagreement could affect passing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

One detailed review says the class required a lot of work for a one-unit course.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students found her inspiring, but others describe her as uncaring, rigid, and unwilling to hear students.

Format shift

, and the teaching evidence is split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize work, attendance, attention, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

comments and two comments saying the class is fair or inspiring if students attend and work.

Main concern

Students may find her rigid or dismissive if they disagree or ask questions.

What students said

“ .”
CDEV152
“I knew nothing about autism before I entered her class and left with a passion for the subject.”
CDEV160
“If you do the work, listen and attend class, you should do fine.”
CD160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, quiz format, open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do the work, listen and attend class, you should do fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grade path. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Shes not interested in letting the her herself talk.”

📈 Grade Path

62/100

“If you do the work, listen and attend class, you should do fine.”

⚖️ Workload Balance

35/100

“did require a lot of work for a 1 unit class.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not care for students.
  • She's awesome.
  • Shes not interested in letting the

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • If you do the work, listen and attend class, you should do fine.
  • She gave out , with this I got an A.
  • did require a lot of work for a 1 unit class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and opinions are polarized with limited assessment details.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CD1601 review
CDEV1521 review
CDEV1601 review
CHILD1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values