Mohammad Rahnavard

MATH170 · MATH23 · MATH180 · MATH10A · MATH130 · MATH9066 · MATH80 · CALCULUS · STATS202 · TRIG · CALC1234 · ALG · MATH190 · MATHMATH · MATH160 · MATH · PREALGEBRA · MATH123 · MATH12 · MATH131 · MATH60 · MATH225 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 18/100
RMP rating: 2.0/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 4.1

The decision

unless you are prepared to teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandConfusing LecturesStrict AttendanceVery Hard TestsSelf-Teaching Required

Most students say and hard to understand.
Many reviews describe the course as boring, frustrating, and better learned from the book.
A , but negative experiences dominate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A few students mention easy tests or , but , and heavy self-study to pass.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The material is , and reliance on self-teaching.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several students say , and reviews do not show meaningful flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students strongly discourage taking him because they find him hard to understand, boring, and unhelpful.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Grading evidence is mixed, but and harsh grading comments outweigh a few reports of .

Format shift

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload feels heavy because students often must learn from the book while preparing for .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Repeated complaints , and does not answer questions well.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews mostly discuss tests, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with repeated complaints , and hard tests.

Main concern

Students often feel they must learn from the textbook because lectures are not useful.

What students said

“All he does is copy the book onto the board. .”
CALC1234

“ ! Just rewrites the examples from the book, making it pointless to go to class.”
MATH170

“He makes the class way harder than it has to be.”
MATH130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and at least one cumulative closed-book, closed-notes final.

Hard TestsCumulative Closed-Book FinalClosed Notes FinalGradually Harder Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a cumulative closed-book, closed-notes final.

Hard TestsCumulative Closed-Book FinalClosed Notes Final

“The notes, hardest problems)”
MATH130

“Doesn't collect hw, but .”
MATH170

“ and .”
ALG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“RUN AWAY FROM THIS TEACHER! Extremely horrible teacher, who doesn't know how to teach, what he's teaching, or .”
Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“All he does is copy the book onto the board. .”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

24/100

“The notes, hardest problems)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Couldn't understand because of his thick accent, doesn't help that he mumbles too.
.
Never had a lesson plan and when asked to clarify he would just repeat what he had said.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

He makes the class way harder than it has to be.
and .
!

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

!
Find someone else.
.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 44 in-person reviews across many years show a very consistent pattern despite some outliers.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56

4 out of 51

3 out of 55

2 out of 511

1 out of 521

Course coverage

MATH2311 reviews

MATH1705 reviews

MATH3 reviews

MATH122 reviews

MATH1302 reviews

Show 17 more courses

MATH602 reviews

MATH802 reviews

PREALGEBRA2 reviews

TRIG2 reviews

ALG1 review

CALC12341 review

CALCULUS1 review

MATH10A1 review

MATH1231 review

MATH1311 review

MATH1601 review

MATH1801 review

MATH1901 review

MATH2251 review

MATH90661 review

MATHMATH1 review

STATS2021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

B 1

C range

C 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Mohammad Rahnavard

x x unless you are prepared to teach yourself and x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Mandatory

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

👍 Recommendation Level

⚖️ x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

🚫 About Recommendation

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

unless you are prepared to teach yourself and .

⚖️