AI Rate Professor

Communication

Leeelle Tullis

SL4470 · SLAN15 · SL101 · ASL111 · SLAN101 · SL214 · SL15 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Avoid unless you can learn independently and only need course credit.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedDismissiveOpinionatedTalks Too MuchHard On Homework
  • Most reviews describe her as , and .
  • Grades can be attainable, but students report weak teaching value and poor classroom tone.
  • One older positive review praises her helpfulness, but it is outweighed by repeated negative experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students earned A grades, but the comments do not show an easy A because teaching clarity is weak and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The content itself sounds vocabulary-heavy, but and disorganization make it harder to follow.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

The in-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students warn against taking her because , and ineffective.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades are not impossible, but one student says .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload evidence is limited, with word lists and but no repeated claims of heavy work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most students describe poor teaching, disorganization, excessive talking, and dismissive behavior.

Format shift

older positive exception.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments mainly mention word lists, test prep, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with students citing disorganization, arrogance, and lectures that focus too much on the instructor.

Main concern

and may feel dismissed when asking questions.

What students said

“Disorganized and dismissive of students.”
SL15
“Teacher was difficult to follow.”
SLAN15
“All I got from her was arrogance and a need to be important in the field.”
SL214

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention test prep and word lists but .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format or strictness.

Word Lists For Test PrepExam Policy Not Clear
“ prep.”
ASL111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Disorganized and dismissive of students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, tone, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Teacher was difficult to follow.”

👍 Recommendation Level

20/100

“ but just not her.”

⚖️

48/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teacher was difficult to follow.
  • I think the .
  • Her lectures are over my head.

Theme 2

💬 About Classroom Tone

  • Don't ask questions, she seemed annoyed.
  • Disorganized and dismissive of students.
  • Respect students first so we can respect you.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Work

  • prep.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

, but some are old and light on concrete policy details.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ASL1111 review
SL1011 review
SL151 review
SL2141 review
SL44701 review
Show 2 more courses
SLAN1011 review
SLAN151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values