AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

L. Beckett Lemus

MATH73 · MATH0554 · MATH40 · MATH160 · MATH80 · MATH70 · MATH180 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

She is a good choice for many math students who want support and , but avoid her if .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful NotesExtra CreditMixed ClarityOptional HomeworkUneven Organization
  • Most students , and willingness to support struggling math students.
  • Grades can be manageable because of and , though exams may still be challenging.
  • A minority of , and slow grading feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and several easy-class comments make strong grades realistic, though harder courses still require work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

Many students say she makes math understandable, but and fast or .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they vary by course level.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

but do not clearly prove an .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and , but repeated clarity and organization complaints lower confidence.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

and exam bonus points suggest lenient grading, despite one complaint about losing points for method differences.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

57/100

, but one student reports repeated homework piles.

Format shift

Workload evidence is entirely in person and somewhat mixed.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most reviews praise her help and clarity, but some describe her as .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and , suggesting a balanced assessment mix.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

math courses, but they show uneven clarity and organization.

Main concern

.

What students said

“hermaterial and methods were actually UNDERSTANDABLE.”
MATH70
“ , and flies through lectures leaving you confused.”
MATH73
“Plenty of opportunities.”
MATH80

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention announced and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Announced Quizzes And ExamsChallenging ExamsExtra Points On Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes and exams, including challenging exams and , but .

Announced Quizzes And ExamsChallenging ExamsExtra Points On Exams
“Most of the quizzes and , but challenging.”
MATH80
“Really helpful and .”
MATH160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SHE IS THE !! IF U SUCK !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She really explained the math in a way that you could get it and understand it, I got a "B" out of her class.”

📈 Grade Support

78/100

“She gives I even made a video to pass!”

⚠️ Mixed Clarity

57/100

“ , and flies through lectures leaving you confused.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hermaterial and methods were actually UNDERSTANDABLE.
  • , and she uses the net alot.
  • and her lectures were boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pretty easy class.
  • Plenty of opportunities.
  • Easy if you pay attention

Theme 3

📝

  • .
  • Most of the quizzes and , but challenging.
  • , and flies through lectures leaving you confused.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years provide varied but detailed and mostly consistent evidence.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH704 reviews
MATH402 reviews
MATH732 reviews
MATH05541 review
MATH1601 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1801 review
MATH801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values